Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
MR. M.NAGAPRASANNA, J
SHRI KRISHNAMURTHY – Appellant
Versus
TERAKANAMBI POLICE – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. accused challenging multiple firs related to liquor sales. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. argument about jurisdiction of police in liquor seizure. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. discussion on valid licensing and allegations against accused. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. court's findings on jurisdictional errors and notice requirements. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. final ruling to quash proceedings against petitioner. (Para 11 , 12) |
ORAL ORDER
These petitions are preferred by accused No.2 in all the crimes, challenging different crimes registered against him for offences punishable under Sections 32 and 34 of the Karnataka Excise Act , 1965, Section 188 of the IPC as also the offences under Section 51 (b) of the Disaster Management Act , 2005.
2. Heard Sri B.N.Shetty, learned counsel for petitioner and Sri B.N.Jagadeesha, learned Additional State Public Prosecutor for the State.
3. Facts in brief, germane, are as follows:
On 12.05.2021 claiming to have received certain information that accused No.1 is selling liquor at Bommalapura without obtaining valid licence and had recovered 92 tetra packets containing 90ml of whiskey from accused No.1. Alleging that the said liquor was purchased from the petitioner's wine store
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
