THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
SRI. MAGESH BABU G – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
CRL.P 17319/2025
##PAGE1##
- 1 -
NC: 2026:KHC:6142
CRL.P No. 17319 of 2025
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 17319 OF 2025
(439(Cr.PC) / 483(BNSS))
BETWEEN:
1. SRI. MAGESH BABU G
S/O GUNA SHEKAR
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,
R/AT 18, 5TH CROSS,
2ND MAIN, 2ND STAGE,
GOWTHAMPURA HALASURU,
BENGALURU - 08
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. RAMESHA H N.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by
LAKSHMINARAYANA
MURTHY RAJASHRI
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY ASHOK NAGAR P.S.
REP BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
BENGALURU - 560001.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. M R PATIL, HCCGP)
##PAGE2##- 2 -
NC: 2026:KHC:6142
CRL.P No. 17319 of 2025
HC-KAR
THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 CR.PC (FILED
U/S 483 BNSS) PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON
BAIL IN CR.NO.338/2025 FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 109,61 R/W
3(5) OF BNS 2023 FILED BY THE RESPONDENT ASHOKNAGAR
P.S BENGALURU PENDING BEFORE THE HONBLE COURT OF
THE XXIX ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE AT
BENGALURU
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
ORAL ORDER
The petition is filed by accused No.4 under Section
483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 praying
to grant bail in Crime No.338/2025 of Ashok Nagar Police
Station registered for offences under Sections 109, 61
read with Section 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
2. Heard the learned counsel for petitioner and
learned High Court Government Pleader for
respondent/State.
3. The learned counsel for petitioner would
contend that accused No.1 against whom the overt act of
holding deadly weapon and trying to assault the injured
##PAGE3##- 3 -
NC: 2026:KHC:6142
CRL.P No. 17319 of 2025
HC-KAR
has been granted bail by this Court in Crl.P
No.16041/2025 by order dated 07.01.2026. The
accusation against the petitioner is that he was with
accused Nos.1 and 2 when they chased the injured holding
deadly weapon. There is no allegation of any assault by
this petitioner to the injured. Therefore the petitioner is
entitled for grant of bail on the ground of parity. The
injured has sustained injuries due to fall from the
compound wall and not by the assault by any of the
accused. With this, he prayed to allow the petition.
4. Per contra, the learned High Court Government
Pleader for respondent/State would contend that the
statement of eyewitnesses has been recorded, wherein
they have stated the chasing of the injured by two persons
holding deadly weapons. The matter is under
investigation. If the petitioner is granted bail, there are
chances of hampering the investigation and tampering the
prosecution witnesses. With this, he prayed to reject the
petition.
##PAGE4##- 4 -
NC: 2026:KHC:6142
CRL.P No. 17319 of 2025
HC-KAR
5. Having heard the learned counsel, the Court
has perused the FIR, complaint and other materials placed
on record.
6. This Court while granting bail to accused No.1
by order dated 07.01.2026 passed in Crl.P No.16041/2025
has observed as under:
"6. As per averments of the complaint, there
was an incident on 26.10.2025, in which the
petitioner has stated to have assaulted the
complainant and in turn, the complainant has
also assaulted him. On the day of incident i.e.,
on 27.10.2025 when the complainant was
watching the football match in the stadium at
that time, the petitioner, accused No.2 and other
either (8) friends of the petitioner came to the
stadium wherein the petitioner has chased the
complainant holding long chopper and at that
time, the complainant jumped on the compound
and escaped. Considering the said aspect, there
is no injury caused by this petitioner on the
complainant. The petitioner is in judicial custody
since 30.10.2025 and as the major portion of
investigation is over, the petitioner is not
required for further custodial interrogation. There
are no criminal antecedents of the petitioner".
7. The allegation of holding deadly weapon and
chasing the injured is against accused Nos.1 and 2. The
pet
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.