Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
M G UMA, J
SRI RADHAKRISHNA A – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners seek to quash the learned magistrate's order. (Para 1 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments focus on the failure to follow proper legal procedures. (Para 2 , 6 , 12) |
| 3. court emphasizes the need for adherence to procedural law. (Para 3 , 7 , 9 , 13) |
| 4. defining the role of courts when reviewing police b-reports. (Para 8) |
| 5. final decision is to allow petitions and quash the previous order. (Para 10 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
COMMON ORDER
Petitioners in Crl.P.No.3043/2022 being accused Nos.2, 3 and 7 and petitioners in Crl.P.No.3073/2022 being accused Nos.13 and 14 in CC No.9564/2019 pending on the file of the learned First Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru, are seeking to quash the order dated 08.03.2019 taking cognizance of the offence punishable under Sections 420, 468, 471 R/w Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (for short 'the IPC').
2. Heard Sri. Balagangadhar G.S., learned counsel for the petitioners and Smt. Sowmya R, learned High Court Government Pleader for the respondent No.1 and Smt. Raksha Keerthana, learned counsel for respondent No.2. Perused the materials on record.
3. In view of the rival contentions urged by learned counsel for both the parties, the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
