Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
ASHOK S.KINAGI, J
MS VAISHNAVI VIJAY – Appellant
Versus
RAJIV GANDHI UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. jurisdiction for revaluation petitions arises from university regulations. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. university's adherence to evaluation guidelines validates the ordinance. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 17) |
| 3. contention against the ordinance's legality is presented. (Para 10 , 16 , 18) |
| 4. the court confirms compliance with dci regulations. (Para 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 5. the writ petitions are dismissed with confirmation of ordinance's validity. (Para 39) |
ORAL ORDER
1. The petitioners have filed these writ petitions seeking following reliefs :
In WP No.36115 of 2025:
(i) “To declare that the procedure adopted by RGUHS to conduct only one revaluation under the ordinance dated 05.09.2022 with No.RGU / Auth / 24th Con / Synd / 04 / 2022-23 vide Annexure- C; in so far as it pertains to the BDS Course is illegal, arbitrary, and contrary to DCI Regulations, and
(ii) issue a writ in the nature of certiorari, quashing the impugned revaluation result in the subjects “General Pathology and Microbiology” and “General and Dental Pharmacology and Therapeutics” of the II BDS examinations of October 2025 vide Annexure-B; undertaken by the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the mandator
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
