Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
M. NAGAPRASANNA, J
SRI B.J. RAMASWAMY S/O LATE JAYARAMAIAH – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. nature of the dispute originated from a civil agreement. (Para 4) |
| 2. interlocutory applications and contention of the parties. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. essential ingredients of ipc and misuse of criminal law. (Para 8) |
| 4. judicial criteria for quashing proceedings loosely based on civil matters. (Para 9) |
| 5. final ruling regarding the writ petition and quashing of the fir. (Para 10) |
ORAL ORDER
The petitioners-accused Nos.1 to 3 stand at the doors of this Court calling in question registration of a crime in Crime No.10/2024 registered for offences punishable under Sections420 and 34 of the IPC .
2. Heard Sri R. C. Nagaraja, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Sri Vinay Mahadevaiah, learned HCGP representing the State.
3. The complainant, though served two years ago, has remained unrepresented even today. Therefore, the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned HCGP are heard.
The facts enumerated are as follows:
4. Respondent No.2 is said to be in possession of an unregistered agreement of sale with the petitioners, agreeing to purchase the schedule property within three months from the date of its agreement. The agreement was entered into on 25.10.2014. On 31.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
