Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
S SUNIL DUTT YADAV, J
SRI SATISH KRISHNA SAIL – Appellant
Versus
DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. criteria for medical bail under pmla. (Para 1 , 6) |
| 2. initial bail granted, basis of medical appeal. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 3. requirement for ongoing medical treatment. (Para 8 , 10 , 21) |
| 4. health conditions justify bail consideration. (Para 18 , 19 , 25) |
| 5. final decision on bail granted. (Para 28) |
ORAL ORDER
The petitioner who is accused no.1 before the trial court happens to be the sitting Member of the Karnataka Legislative Assembly has fild the present petition seeking to be enlarged on regular bail or direct the respondent-ED to release him on bail in the event of his arrest/re-arrest in ECIR/BGZO/20/2025 for the offence under Section 3 , punishable under Section 4 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 ('PMLA Act' for short).
2. The brief facts for the purpose of disposal of the present petition which relates to release of the petitioner on bail are that the respondent Enforcement Directorate had registered ECIR/BGZO/20/2025 on 04.08.2025 for the offence under Section 3 , punishable under Section 4 of the PMLA Act, 2002 against accused no.1 and others. Further it is to be noticed that during the process of investigation, petitioner having been arrested, peti
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
