Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
M.NAGAPRASANNA, J
SRI. I.V.S. SURYANARAYANA RAJU – Appellant
Versus
M/S. AMAN FINANCIAL SERVICES – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details regarding the transaction leading to legal proceedings. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. the importance of allowing further cross-examination to ensure justice. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. the final decision to allow the application for the recall of the witness. (Para 8) |
ORAL ORDER
Petitioner is before this Court calling in question an order of the concerned Court dated 31.12.2025 which rejects an application of the petitioner-complainant filed under Section 311 of the Code of Criminal Procedure/Section 348 of the BNSS.
2. Heard Sri.Shakthidhar S Shanker, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Sri.Sreedhara G.R, learned counsel appearing for the respondent.
3. Petitioner is the complainant, respondent-the accused. The two have a transaction. The transaction leads to a dispute. The dispute leads the parties before the concerned Court for offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The issue in the lis is not with regard to the merit of the matter but an application being filed by the complainant seeking recall of DW.1 for further cross- examination. The application was second in line, therefore, the concerned Court rejects the application on the score
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
