SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 4929

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
MURALI – Appellant
Versus
H.B. LOKESH – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.788 OF 2023 (INJ)

BETWEEN: 1. MURALI S/O G. THIMMAIAH AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS

2. GIRI S/O G. THIMMAIAH AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS ALL ARE R/AT NO.1/9 FLOUR MILL, THIMMAIAH BADAVANE NAGADEVANAHALLI GOLLARAHATTI, NEAR RING ROAD KENGERI HOBLI BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK BANGALORE-560 056.

…APPELLANTS Digitally signed by AL BHAGYA Location: HI GH (BY SRI. KALLEGOWDA .S.K, ADVOCATE)

COURT OF KARNATAKA AND:

1. H.B. LOKESH S/O M. BASAVAPPA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS R/O NO. 52/26, 1ST MAIN ROAD MARENAHALLI, VIJAYANAGAR BANGALORE-560 040.

…RESPONDENT (BY SRI. VIRUPAKSHAIAH .P.H, ADVOCATE)

THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 R/W ORDER 41 RULE 1 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 01.04.2022 PASSED IN OS No.4351/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE V ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION.

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM

ORAL JUDGMENT

The captioned appeal is by the defendant Nos.3 and

4 assailing the judgment

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top