Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR, J
INDRAMMA W/O GOVINDARAJU, D/O LATE NARAYANAPPA – Appellant
Versus
NAGAMMA W/O LATE NARAYANAPPA HULLI – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. judicial review can compel assessment of procedural adherence in partition suits. (Para 1) |
| 2. allegations of improper transfer do not warrant striking of valid and relevant pleadings. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. failure to adhere to procedural rules results in judicial intervention. (Para 6) |
ORAL ORDER
This petition by the plaintiff in O.S.No.522/2025 on the file of the Additional Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Tumkur is directed against the impugned order passed on I.A.No.6/2025 dated 25.11.2025, whereby the said application filed by 3rd respondent - 3rd defendant under Order VI Rule 16 of CPC seeking striking of the pleadings in relation to the 3rd respondent -3rd defendant and also delete property bearing suit Item No.’d’ from the array of properties was allowed by the trial Court.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the respondent No.3 and learned AGA for respondent No.8 and perused the material on record. For the order proposed, notice to respondent Nos.1, 2, 4 to 7 are dispensed with.
3. A perusal of the material on record will indicate that the petitioner-plaintiff instituted the aforesaid suit against the respondents-defendants for partition and
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
