Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
K.S. HEMALEKHA, J
SMT. DHANALAKSHMI W/O R. PRAKASH REDDY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background and facts of land acquisition process. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments presented by petitioners and respondents. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. court's considerations regarding jurisdiction and authority. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. legal reasoning and determinations related to title and compensation. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 5. final ruling and disposition of the case. (Para 26 , 27) |
CAV ORDER
The petitioners have approached this Court calling in question the impugned order dated 12.09.2025 passed by the Special Land Acquisition Officer (SLAO), KIADB, under Section 29 (2) of the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966 (‘KIAD Act’ for short) in respect of land bearing Survey No.18/12, Roopena Agrahara Village, Begur Hobli, Bengaluru South Taluk, measuring 241.73 square meters.
Brief facts:
2. The petitioners are the legal heirs of late Nanjappa Reddy, who was the owner and cultivator of several properties, including Survey Nos.18/6, 18/7, 18/8, 18/9 and 18/12 in Roopena Agrahara Village, Begur Hobli, Bengaluru South Taluk. These lands were originally notified for acquisition by the BDA for formation of a layout between Hos
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
