Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
MS. JYOTI M, J
SRI M K NAGESH – Appellant
Versus
SRI RAMESH REDDY R – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. criteria for temporary injunction applications including delay consequences. (Para 2 , 4) |
| 2. review of legal standards governing temporary injunctions and implications of delay. (Para 5 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. final ruling on the dismissal of the appeal and its ramifications. (Para 6 , 11 , 12) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
Sri. Pratik Pany, counsel for the appellants, and Sri. V.Srinivas, counsel for respondents 34 and 35, appeared in person.
2. The captioned appeal is filed to set aside the order dated 22.07.2025 passed by the Court of XXXV Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge Bangalore (CCH 36) on IA Nos.1 and 2 in O.S.No.1673/2024.
As this is an appeal filed under Order 43, the scope of inquiry is limited only to the impugned order arising from the interlocutory application, and does not extend to the merits of the main suit.
3. For convenience’s the parties shall be referred to as per their status and ranking before the Trial Court.
4. The plaintiffs filed a suit seeking a decree directing the defendants to effect partition and put them in separate possession of their 1/3rd share in the schedule immovable property. To declare that the compromise dated 05.10.2002 obtained by defend
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
