Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
MS. JYOTI M, J
SRI M K NAGESH – Appellant
Versus
SRI RAMESH REDDY R – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. criteria for temporary injunction applications including delay consequences. (Para 2 , 4) |
| 2. review of legal standards governing temporary injunctions and implications of delay. (Para 5 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. final ruling on the dismissal of the appeal and its ramifications. (Para 6 , 11 , 12) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
2. The captioned appeal is filed to set aside the order dated 22.07.2025 passed by the Court of XXXV Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge Bangalore (CCH 36) on IA Nos.1 and 2 in O.S.No.1673/2024.
3. For convenience’s the parties shall be referred to as per their status and ranking before the Trial Court.
Defendants Nos.34 and 35 filed the written statement, and notably, they adopted the contentions and averments made in the Written Statement as their objections to the Plaintiff's Temporary Injunction Application (IA) and prayed for the dismissal of the application. The Trial Court, in its order dated:22.07.2025, dismissed the application. Under these circumstances, the appellants have filed the above appeal on several grounds as set out in the Memorandum of Appeal. Counsel for the respective parties presented several contentions. Counsel for respondents 34 and 35
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
