Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
H.P.SANDESH, VENKATESH NAIK T, JJ
SRI MUHAMMED ZEESHAN – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. premature transfer claims and the context. (Para 3 , 4 , 6) |
| 2. government's stance on transfer and legal defenses. (Para 8 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. procedural considerations concerning transfer validity. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. legal implications of violations of transfer guidelines. (Para 19 , 20) |
| 5. final rulings on the transfer order. (Para 22 , 23) |
ORAL ORDER
Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 3 – State, and learned counsel appearing for respondent No.5. Notice to respondent No.4 is dispensed with.
"1. Issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writs or orders quashing the order dated 19- 11-2025 passed by the Hon'ble Karnataka State Administrative Tribunal in Application No.2978/2025 vide Annexure A and allow said Application No.2978/2025 by the order dated 30/06/2025 bearing No.32/2025-26 in serial No.20 produced as Annexure A1 and order dated 30/06/2025 bearing No.31/2025-26 in serial No.89 and 90 produced as Annexure A2 and order to forthwith reinstate the petitioner to continue his service as Range Forest Officer, Mysuru Range.
3. The contention of the petitioner in the writ pe
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
