Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
MR. SURAJ GOVINDARAJ, J
SRI SACHIN NARAYAN – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural guidelines for public auctions (Para 1 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. rights of tenants regarding auction participation (Para 2 , 6) |
| 3. final ruling on petition disposition (Para 3 , 8 , 9) |
ORAL ORDER
1. Learned AGA accepts notice for respondents No.1 and 2.
2. Sri.G.M.Ananda., learned counsel is directed to accept notice for respondent No.3 and 4.
3. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:
i) Call for records pertains to Commercial Shops Public E-auction publication publication bearing No. Pu.Ka.Kru/Kam/Sha/E-Auction/01/2025-26 dated: 19.01.2026 issued by respondent no.3.
ii) Issue writ in the nature of certiorari to quash the Commercial Shops Public E-auction publication bearing No. Pu.Ka.Kru/Kam/Sha/E- Auction/01/2025-26 dated: 19.01.2026 issued by respondent no.3 as per Annexure-A as illegal bad in law. in so fear of petitioners concerned.
iii) Pass any appropriate order deems fit to the facts and circumstances of the case and to meet the interest of justice.
4. The grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioners being the tenants of various shops in Commercial Shopping Complex at K.R.Pet, the respondents are now proposing to auction the said
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
