THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
MR. SURAJ GOVINDARAJ, J
SRI SACHIN NARAYAN – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural guidelines for public auctions (Para 1 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. rights of tenants regarding auction participation (Para 2 , 6) |
| 3. final ruling on petition disposition (Para 3 , 8 , 9) |
ORAL ORDER
2. Sri.G.M.Ananda., learned counsel is directed to accept notice for respondent No.3 and 4.
i) Call for records pertains to Commercial Shops Public E-auction publication publication bearing No. Pu.Ka.Kru/Kam/Sha/E-Auction/01/2025-26 dated: 19.01.2026 issued by respondent no.3.
iii) Pass any appropriate order deems fit to the facts and circumstances of the case and to meet the interest of justice.
5. Merely, because, the petitioners are tenants as regard the commercial shop, they cannot continue to be using the said premises after the expiry of the lease. In terms of the guidelines issued in the year 2019, it is but required for the TMCs to deal with the public properties by way of public auction and during that stage, a existing tenant has an option to participate in the auction and if successful to continue to retain the possession by making payment in terms of the auction notification. In the event of the existing tenant not being successful, possession would have to be handed o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.