PRINCIPAL BENCH AT BENGALURU
JAMEELUNNISA BEGUM – Appellant
Versus
KALAIAH – Respondent
This appeal is preferred by the appellants-plaintiffs
challenging the judgment and decree dated 12.03.2012 passed
by Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Arkalgud in R.A.No.430/2008,
which confirmed the judgment and decree dated 25.01.2007
passed by the Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and JMFC, Arkalgud in
O.S.No.244/2003.
2. Parties shall be referred to as per their status before
the trial Court.
3. The original plaintiff filed a suit against the defendants
for the relief of declaration to declare that the plaintiff is the
absolute owner of the suit schedule property and also to
declare that the sale deed executed in favour of defendant No.1
by defendant Nos.2 and 4 does not bind the title and interest of
the plaintiff and for the relief of permanent injunction and other
consequential reliefs.
4. It is the case of plaintiff that she is the absolute owner
of the suit schedule property, which originally belonged to the
husband of defendant No.2 and father of defendant Nos.3 and
4 by name, one Sri Abdul Khalak Sab. It is the further case of
- 5 -
the plaintiff that defendant Nos.2 and 4 have sold the
properties in favour of the plaintiff pertaining to two properties
namely, survey Nos.77/10 and 7
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.