SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

PRINCIPAL BENCH AT BENGALURU
JAMEELUNNISA BEGUM – Appellant
Versus
KALAIAH – Respondent


This appeal is preferred by the appellants-plaintiffs

challenging the judgment and decree dated 12.03.2012 passed

by Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Arkalgud in R.A.No.430/2008,

which confirmed the judgment and decree dated 25.01.2007

passed by the Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and JMFC, Arkalgud in

O.S.No.244/2003.

2. Parties shall be referred to as per their status before

the trial Court.

3. The original plaintiff filed a suit against the defendants

for the relief of declaration to declare that the plaintiff is the

absolute owner of the suit schedule property and also to

declare that the sale deed executed in favour of defendant No.1

by defendant Nos.2 and 4 does not bind the title and interest of

the plaintiff and for the relief of permanent injunction and other

consequential reliefs.

4. It is the case of plaintiff that she is the absolute owner

of the suit schedule property, which originally belonged to the

husband of defendant No.2 and father of defendant Nos.3 and

4 by name, one Sri Abdul Khalak Sab. It is the further case of

- 5 -

the plaintiff that defendant Nos.2 and 4 have sold the

properties in favour of the plaintiff pertaining to two properties

namely, survey Nos.77/10 and 7

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top