Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
M. Nagaprasanna, J
SMT. PREETI MANEESH W/O MANEESH PUTTUR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to crime registration based on factual inaccuracy. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. arguments on nature of allegations and rights of involved parties. (Para 4 , 6) |
| 3. final ruling on quashing fir due to lack of credible allegations. (Para 8 , 9) |
ORAL ORDER
Petitioners - accused Nos.1 to 3 are before this Court calling in question registration of a crime in Crime No.341/2023, pending before the 5th Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru, for the offences under Sections 341 , 342, 323, 504 r/w. 34 of the IPC .
2. Heard Smt. Divya R.B., learned counsel for petitioners, Sri K. Nageshwarappa, learned High Court Government Pleader for respondent No.1 and Sri A.R.Chandrashekar, learned counsel for respondent No.2.
3. Petitioners are accused Nos.1 to 3 and respondent No.2, the complainant. The complainant and the accused were in the same Institution ‘Learning Space Education Trust’. Respondent No.2 - complainant, owing to certain allegations or otherwise is said to have been removed from the trust. The alleged acts of removal from service, becomes a crime in Crime No.341/2023, registered before the police on 02.09.2020, for the afore-quoted offences.
4. Learned counsel ap
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
