Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
M.NAGAPRASANNA, J
SRI VENKATA SUBBA JOIS D.R. – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. registration of fir details. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. argument against absence of instigation. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. discussion on b-report and the complaints. (Para 9) |
| 4. court's reasoning on the lack of evidence. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. final decision and its rationale. (Para 12) |
ORAL ORDER
The petitioner is sole accused in Crime No.71/2016, he is before this Court calling in question the registration of the crime in crime No.71/2024 and the order passed in Crl.R.P.No.195/2022. The second respondent is the complainant. The allegation in the complaint is that the husband of the complainant had been working in a Sri Annapoorneshwari temple, Horanadu for over 25 years and was receiving monthly salary. The husband of the complainant and her son is said to have approached one Sri. Ramanarayana Joshi and requested to set up a service station. Sri. Ramanarayana Joshi is said to have told them that the service station was not required, but suggested setting up of a shop instead. The husband of the complainant then opens a shop near the temple.
2. On 10.05.2016, the allegation is that the petitioner calls and questions the complainant's husband, as to who has authorized or permitted him to ope
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
