Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
S.R.Krishna Kumar, J
Sri. G. Sathyanarayana – Appellant
Versus
M/S Tara & Murthy, Chandana B – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of the parties involved in the writ petitions (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. claims regarding the investment and contractual obligations (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. defense arguments regarding liability and non-joinder of parties (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. implications of reconstitution deeds on partnership liability (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. court's analysis on the merits of deletion applications and trial necessity (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
ORAL ORDER
Both these petitions by the plaintiff in Com.O.S.No.225/2024 on the file of the Commercial Court.
W.P.No.18902/2025 is directed against the impugned order dated 30.09.2024 passed on I.A.No.5 by the learned LXXXVII Additional City Civil & Sessions Judge, Commercial Court at Bangalore in Comm.O.S.No.225/2024.
W.P.No.18905/2025 is directed against the impugned order dated 16.04.2025 passed on I.A.Nos.9 to 11 by the learned LXXXVII Additional City Civil & Sessions Judge, Commercial Court at Bangalore in Comm.O.S.No.225/2024.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents and perused the material on record.
3. A perusal of the material on record will indicate that the petitioner-plaintiff instituted the aforesaid suit against se
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
