Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
M G UMA, J
DOMANIKA S/O SABASTIN – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the court examined the allegations of impersonation and prior convictions. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. discussion on the insufficiency of evidence against the petitioners. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 8) |
| 3. reflection on previous judgments impacting current proceeding. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 19 , 20) |
| 4. analysis of the procedural correctness of the proceedings. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 5. the final ruling quashing the criminal proceedings due to lack of merit. (Para 21) |
ORAL ORDER
2. Heard Sri. B. Lathif, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri. Rangaswamy. R, learned HCGP for respondent No.1 and Sri. Syed Akbar Pasha, learned counsel for respondent No.2. Perused the materials on record.
"Whether the petitioners have made out any grounds to allow the petition and to quash the criminal proceedings initiated against them?"
REASONS
5. It is the contention of respondent No.2 that, he is Domanik S/o Sebastian resident of Kerala, he was granted immovable property in Sy.No.40 of Borekoppanakaval by the Tahsildar and since then, he was in possession and ownership of the property. He sold the property in favour of one Smt. Kempamma, under the sale deed dated 18.01.2010, for a valid cons
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
