Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
M.NAGAPRASANNA, J
MR. VISHAK G. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. parties involved and basic factual context. (Para 1 , 2 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. contentions regarding criminal trespass and intimidation. (Para 6 , 9) |
| 3. judicial analysis and recognition of procedural fairness. (Para 7) |
| 4. legal precedent established on trespass and threats. (Para 10 , 12) |
ORAL ORDER
The petitioners are before this Court calling in question proceedings in C.C. No.51315/2021 arising out of Crime No.638/2019 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 447 and 506 read with Section 34 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 (for short, ' IPC ').
2. Heard the learned Senior counsel, Smt. Lakshmy Iyengar, appearing for the petitioners in Crl. P Nos.40/2024 and 3976/2024 and learned counsel, Sri. Kiran B.Y., appearing for the petitioner in Crl. P No.3913/2024.
3. The proxy counsel appearing for the respondent No.2 seeks time, yet again.
4. This Court on 06.02.2026, owing to the fact that the respondents had gone on seeking adjournment for two years, had passed the following Order:
"Heard the learned Senior counsel, Smt. Lakshmy Iyengar, appearing for the petitioners.
Learned counsel appearing for the respondents has gone on seeking adjournment after adjournment for the la
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
