Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
M.NAGAPRASANNA, J
MOHAMMED GHOUSE S/O LATE MOHAMMAD SARDAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA BY MADIVALA POLICE STATION – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. nature of challenge against criminal proceedings. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. context of allegations and statutory requirements. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. focus on representation and lack of evidence. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. legal principles regarding abuse of process. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. outcome of quashing proceedings. (Para 10) |
ORAL ORDER
The petitioners are before this Court calling in question the proceedings in CC.No.327/2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 504 and 506 of the IPC .
2. Heard the learned counsel Smt. Divya K., appearing for the petitioners, and the learned HCGP Sri. K. Nageshwarappa, appearing for respondent No.1. Respondent No.2 - complainant though served long ago remains unrepresented even as on date.
3. On 07.01.2026, this Court had passed the following order:
"Heard learned counsel for petitioners.
Awaiting representation of the respondent- complainant, as a last chance, list this matter on 28.01.2026 Interim order granted earlier is extended till the next date of hearing."
On 07.01.2026, there was no representation on behalf of the respondent-complainant. The matter was directed to be listed on 28.01.2026. The matter is listed today. Even today there is n
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
