Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
M.NAGAPRASANNA, J
DEVARAJ H.D – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. identification of parties and case background. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. petitioners contend no basis for allegations. (Para 4) |
| 3. respondent refutes petitioners' defense with evidence. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. court's analysis of facts and arguments presented. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. legal interpretation of section 494 ipc regarding participation. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 6. assessment of remaining charges against accused. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 7. final order and conclusions of the court. (Para 13) |
ORAL ORDER
The petitioners are accused Nos.1 to 10. They stand at the doors of this Court calling in question proceedings in C.C.No.13849/2025 registered for offences punishable under Sections 498A , 323, 494, 417, 504, 506, 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ('the IPC ' for short) and Sections 3 and 4 of the DOWRY PROHIBITION ACT , 1961.
2. Heard Anil Shekar K.S., learned counsel appearing for the petitioners; Sri. K. Nageshwarappa, learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for respondent No.1 and Sri. A.N. Jagadish Shastri, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2.
3. Respondent No.2 is the complainant. The petitioner No.1/accused No.1 is the husband. All others, family members of the husband, except accu
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
