Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR, J
MR PRAJWAL @ PRAJWAL RAJ – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's non-possession of seized drugs (Para 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments on co-accused statements (Para 5) |
| 3. court's reliance on precedents (Para 6) |
ORAL ORDER
In this petition, the petitioner – accused No.2 seeks quashing of the criminal proceedings in Spl.C.No.73/2025 (arising out of FIR in Crime No.92/2025 of Udupi Town Police Station), pending on the file of the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Udupi (for short “the Trial Court”), for the offence punishable under Sections 8 (c) and 22(b) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act , 1985 (for short “the NDPS Act”).
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned HCGP for respondents and perused the material on record.
3. Respondent No.2- Complainant/ Police Officer lodged a complaint on 10.06.2025 against the petitioner-accused No.2 as well as accused No.1 – Vijay, on the subject matter being 4.42 grams of methamphetamine and 1.97 grams of methylene-dioxy methamphetamine (MDMA) was seized from the custody and possession of accused No.1 on 10.06.2025 and based on the alleged statement made by the aforesaid accused No.1, the petitioner was arrayed as accused No.2. Thereafter, chargesheet was fil
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
