Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
H.P.SANDESH, VENKATESH NAIK T, JJ
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Appellant
Versus
RAMESHA @ SAKKARE – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the parties involved and initial claims made. (Para 1 , 2 , 4) |
| 2. main arguments presented by the appellant regarding the trial court's decision. (Para 3 , 5 , 6 , 12) |
| 3. court's reasoning for upholding the acquittal based on insufficient evidence. (Para 11 , 13 , 14) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
Heard learned Addl. SPP Smt. Rashmi Jadhav, appearing for the appellant/State.
This appeal is filed by the State challenging the judgment of acquittal dated 30.10.2017 passed in S.C.No.307/2014 on the file of VI Addl. District and Special Judge, Mysuru acquitting respondents Nos.1 to 3/accused Nos.1 to 3 of the offences punishable under Sections 366, 376(2) (i) & (n) and 506 IPC and also under Sections 5 (1) r/w 6 & 17 of POCSO Act and prayed this Court to set aside the judgment of acquittal and convict respondent Nos.1 to 3/accused Nos.1 to 3 for the charges levelled against them.
3. The main contention of Smt. Rashmi Jadhav, learned Addl. SPP appearing for the appellant/State is that the trial Judge committed an error in coming to the conclusion that the prosecution has not proved the case and committed an error in acquitting the accused and also failed to take note of the ev
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
