Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
R. Devaraj, J
SRI B UTTAM KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
SMT GEETHA PRAKASH – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. impleadment of additional parties. (Para 2 , 4 , 6) |
| 2. arguments around necessity and propriety in party addition. (Para 3 , 5 , 10) |
| 3. judicial discretion in implementation. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. final verdict dismissing the petition. (Para 11) |
ORAL ORDER
In this petition, petitioner seeks the following reliefs:
Wherefore, the petitioner most respectfully prays that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to
A Call for the records pending disposal on the file of the Court of the X Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, at Bengaluru (CCH-26) in O.S No 1307/2023,
B. Allow this Writ petition and consequently, set-aside the impugned order dated 3/01/2026 in OS No 1307/2023 rejecting the application (IA No 487) made by the respondent No 1 under Order 1 Rule 10 of CPC, 1908 on the file of Court of X Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge at Bengaluru (CCH-26) which is produced as Annexure-A.
C. Pass any other order/s as this Hon'ble Court deem fit to pass under the facts and circumstances of the revision petition.
2. This petition by the defendant No.3 in O.S.No.1307/2023 is directed against the impugned order dated 03.01.2026 passed by the X Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge,
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
