ORAL ORDER

ORDER ON IA-12, 13, 14 AND 15 FILED BY THE PLAINTIFF.

2. Along with the applications, the plaintiff has filed affidavits sworn to by its authorized person by name Ravindra. In the said affidavits, it is stated by him that the case is set down for arguments on merits. In his cross examination, it is suggested by the defendant that it has paid the amount and in that regard he (PW.1) has stated that the amount paid by the defendant are not pertaining to pending invoices. Therefore, the plaintiff has to produce said documents in order to establish its case. It is further say of the plaintiff that this court has framed an additional issue as to the maintainability on 20/9/22. In this regard the plaintiff has already led the evidence and produced a document with the application. But this court has rejected the said document which is nothing but the affidavit of the witness proposed to be examined. In the cross examination, it is further suggested that the signature found in Ex. P.15 is not the signature of the