SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 7993

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
,
M/S. AMAZON DISTRIBUTORS PVT. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
M/S. SAISANJ RETAIL PVT. LTD. – Respondent


Table of Content
1. plaintiff's petition to reopen case due to new evidence. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. defendant's objections to the plaintiff's late application. (Para 5 , 6)

ORAL ORDER

This petition by the plaintiff in Com.O.S.No.1051/2021 on the file of X Addl.District and Sessions Judge, Bangalore Rural District, Bangalore (commercial court), is directed against the impugned order dated 22.07.2024, whereby the applications filed by the petitioner in I.A.Nos.12, 13, 14 and 15 to reopen the case, to recall PW-2 and for production of documents, were allowed in part by the commercial court as hereunder:-

ORDER ON IA-12, 13, 14 AND 15 FILED BY THE PLAINTIFF.

The plaintiff has IA-12 under section 151 of CPC, IA-13- under order 18 rule 17 read with section 151 of CPC, IA-14 under order 16 rule 1 read with 151 of CPC and IA- 15- under order 11 rule (5) read with section 151 of CPC as amended by the commercial courts act 2015 in order to recall and reopen Pw2 for further evidence and permission to produce the document and to take the witness list and such other reliefs by condoning the delay.

2. Along with the applications, the plaintiff has filed affidavits sworn to by its authorized person by

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top