Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
MRS. ANU SIVARAMAN, MR. VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL, JJ
SRI NARENDRA GOPAL GOWDA A N – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. legal basis for habeas corpus petition due to improper detention. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments for and against the validity of the detention order. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. judicial analysis of preventive detention criteria and requisite legal standards. (Para 6 , 9 , 10 , 12) |
| 4. criteria for justifying preventive detention must be established. (Para 8 , 13) |
| 5. conclusively quashing detaining orders based on invalid rationale. (Para 17 , 18) |
CAV ORDER
This petition is filed by the brother of the detenue seeking a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the detention order dated 30.08.2025 passed in No.MAG(2)CR/L&O/03/2025-26 by the Respondent No.2, Order of Approval No.HD 474 SST 2025 dated 04.09.2025 and the Order of Confirmation No.HD 474 SST 2025 dated 09.10.2025 by the Respondent No.1 detaining the detenue in Central Prison, Mysuru, under the provisions of Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activities, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders, Gamblers, Goondas (Immoral Trafficking Offenders, Slum Grabbers and Video or Audio Pirates) Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Goonda Act').
3. Sri.Ranganath Reddy R., learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the detentio
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
