SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 442884

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
V. Srishananda, J.
Mohammed Asifoddin v. State of Karnataka


1. Heard Sri Sanjay A Patil, learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. Notice issued to respondent No.2 is not returned nor acknowledgment received. Notice to respondent Nos.3 to 6 is not yet ordered.

3. The present writ petitions are filed under Art.226 of the Constitution of India r/w S.482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure praying to quash and set - aside the FIR dated 13.05.2024 bearing Crime No.0184/2024 vide Annexure A registered by Gudamba PS, Lucknow District, Uttar Pradesh under S.498A, S.313 and S.323 IPC pending on the file of the learned Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate - VII, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh and all other subsequent proceedings against the petitioners and to direct respondent No.1 police officials to provide police protections to the petitioners.

4. This Court heard regarding maintainability of the petitions in view of the prayer referred to supra.

5. Facts of the case in brief which are utmost necessary for disposal of the present petition are as under:
Respondent No.6 - Ms. Ankurita Sharma, claiming to be the wife of Mohammed Asifoddin - petitioner No.1 in WP No.201810/2024 filed a complaint with Gudamba Police Station, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh for the offence punish




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top