SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 8178

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU


DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026


PRESENT


THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE


AND


THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA


WRIT PETITION NO. 2922 OF 2023 (GM-MM_S)


C/W


WRIT PETITION NO. 10370 OF 2022 (GM-MM_S)


IN WP No. 2922/2023


BETWEEN:


M/S VIVEK EXPORTS REG UNDER THE INDIAN PARTNERSHIP ACT, 1932 HAVING ITS REGISTERED
OFFICE AT NO. 30/1, 2ND CROSS CHIKKANA GARDEN, SHANKARPURA Digitally BANGALORE - 560032
signed by REP BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER NIRMALA SHRI N NANDA KUMAR DEVI
Location:


…PETITIONER HIGH (BY SRI. D.L.N. RAO, SENIOR ADVOCATE A/W COURT OF
SRI. SRINIVASA C, ADVOCATE)
KARNATAKA


AND:


1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPT OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRIES
VIKASA SOUDHA BANGALORE - 560001
REP BY ITS SECRETARY


2. THE DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY
KHANIJA BHAVAN, RACE COURSE ROAD BANGALORE - 560001


…RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. NILOUFER AKBAR, AGA FOR R1 & R2)


THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI OR ANY WRIT OR ORDER AND QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 20/01/2016 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 BEARING NO.SAM.GA.BHUE/C.M.N/KA GA GU-/KA GA GU SAM-439/01, 2015-16 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.


IN WP NO. 10370/2022


BETWEEN:


KUM INTERNATIONALS SY. NO. 439/2, 9TH K.M.
BADANAGUPPE VILLAGE MYSORE ROAD,
CHAMARAJANAGARA 571313 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER SRI. V.ANANTHA KUMAR AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS
R/O BILIGIRI, B.R. HILLS ROAD, CHAMARAJANAGARA 571313


...PETITIONER (BY SRI. B V VIDYULATHA.,ADVOCATE)


AND:


1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRIES
VIKASA SOUDHA BANGALORE 560 001
BY ITS SECRETARY


2. THE DIRECTOR
DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY KHANIJA BHAVANA
RACE COURSE ROAD, BANGALORE 560 001


...RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. NILOUFER AKBAR, AGA)


THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER SIMILAR WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION, QUASHING THE ORDER DATED 10/12/2020 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT BEARING NO.GABHUUE/UUNI(KKA.AA)/KAGAGUASA-58/08-09/2020-21/4782 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT AT ANNEXURE-M TO THE WRIT PETITION AND ETC.


THESE WRIT PETITIONS HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED FOR ORDERS, COMING ON FOR PRONOUNCEMENT THIS DAY, ORDER WAS PRONOUNCED AS UNDER:
















CORAM: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE and
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA

CAV ORDER

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA)

1. Writ Petition No.10370/2022 [subject 'A' writ petition] is filed calling in question the endorsement dated 10.12.2020 issued by the Director, Department of Mines and Geology, whereunder the application for grant of quarry lease [Quarry Lease Application No.58/2008-2009 dated 13.08.2008] filed by the writ petitioner - M/s KUM Internationals [KUM] was rejected. In the said writ petition a direction was also sought for execution of the Quarry Lease Deed in respect of the area applied for by KUM.

2. Writ Petition No.2922/2023 [subject 'B' writ petition] is filed calling in question the endorsement dated 22.01.2016 issued by the Director of Department of Mines and Geology, whereunder the revision petition filed by the writ petitioner - M/s Vivek Exports [Vivek Exports] has been rejected. The said writ petitioner has also sought for consideration of the representation made by it seeking to grant extension of Quarry Lease No.439 for a period of 50 years from the date of original grant.

3. Since the land which is the subject matter of leases/applications in both writ petitions overlap, they are taken up together for consideration.

Background facts

4. Vide Quarry Lease No.1915, one Mr.Zia-Ul-Haq was granted permission for quarrying ornamental stone and black granite over an area of 50 acres in Survey No.184 of Jyothigondanapura Village, Chamarajanagar Taluk, Mysore District [subject property] for a period of 5 years from 27.02.1978, which expired on 27.02.1983. The renewal was granted on 18.01.1983 for a period of 5 years w.e.f., 27.02.1983 (Quarry Lease No.3765). It is contented that a second renewal was applied for on 24.11.1987. Writ Petition No.4717/1987 was filed by the said Mr.Zia-Ul-Haq to consider his renewal application.

5. The Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1969 [KMMC Rules 1969] was amended vide KMMC (Amendment) Rules, 1979 and Rule 3A was introduced to prevent quarry lease to be granted to private persons. The said Mr.Zia-Ul-Haq filed Writ Petition No.20544/1990 challenging the validity of Rule 3A of the KMMC 1969 Rules (Amended in 1990). A learned Single Judge of this Court vide interim order dated 16.10.1990 granted stay of Rule 3A and permitted the writ petitioner to carryon quarrying operations subject to payment of royalty. Vide order dated 18.04.1991, the said writ petition [WP No.20544/1990] was disposed of permitting the writ petitioner to file a fresh application on or before 30.04.1991 and directed the State Government to consider the same within 3 months. Till then, it was ordered that status quo as on the said date should continue. It is contented that the writ petitioner had filed an application for renewal on 30.04.1991.

6. On 18.06.1991, a Government Order [GO] was issued relaxing Rule 3A of the KMMC Rules. Based on the said GO, leases were granted including Quarry Lease Nos.6270 and 6271 in favour of Mr.Zia-Ul-Haq. A public interest litigation in Writ Petition No.14783-14241/1991 was filed challenging the said GO dated 18.06.1991, which relaxed Rule 3A of the KMMC Rules. The said writ petition [WP No.14783-14241/1991] was allowed by a learned Single Judge on 13.03.1992 and the said GO dated 18.06.1991 was quashed. Mr.Zia-Ul-Haq and some other lease holders from amongst the 203 persons, who were granted leases, filed Writ Appeal No.1464-65/1993 challenging the order of the learned Single Judge. The said appeal [WA No.1464-65/1993] was dismissed by a Co-ordinate Bench on 25.06.1993. The challenge made before the Supreme Court by some of the lease holders [Civil Appeal Nos.1683-1716/1996 with Nos.1717 to 1789/1996 was rejected by the Supreme Court on 18.01.1996 [Alankar Granites Industries and others vs. P.G.R.Scindia, MLA and others: (1996) 7 SCC 416]

7. In the meanwhile, the KMMC Rules, 1994 came into force and 1969 Rules were repealed. Writ Petition

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top