SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 8213

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
M.G.S. KAMAL
YOGISHA K M – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KADUR POLICE – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 367 OF 2026 (U/S 14(A) (2))

BETWEEN:

YOGISHA K M S/O MANJUNATHA, AGED 23 YEARS, R/O H.D. DEVEGOWDA BADAVANE, BEHIND LIC OFFICE, KADUR, CHIKKAMAGALURU- 577548 …APPELLANT (BY SRI. V D RAVIRAJ., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1. THE STATE OF KADUR POLICE KADUR POLICE, CHIKKAMAGALURU REPRESENTED BY S.P.P. HIGH COURT BUILDING, Digitally BANGALORE.

signed by SUMA B N Location: 2. VICTIM HIGH COURT MINOR, REPRESENTED BY HER MOTHER OF KARNATAKA AND TURAL GUARDIAN SMT. NALINI, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/O H.D. DEVEGOWDA BADAVANE, NEAR LIC OFFICE, KADUR, CHIKKAMAGALURU- 577 548.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. M.DIVAKAR MADDUR., HCGP FOR R1)

THIS CRL.A. IS FILED U/S 14(A)(2) OF SC/ST (POA) ACT, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATE 20.12.2025, CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT OF BAIL TO THE APPELLANT IN SPL.C.(P) NO.134/2025 (CR.NO.265/2025) ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, FTSC-1 AT CHIKKAMAGALURU FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 65(1). 64(2)(m) AND 351(2) OF BNS, SECTIONS 4(2) AND 6 OF POCSO ACT AND SECTIONS 3(1)(w) (i) (ii) AND

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top