Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
R DEVDAS, J
SMT. SHWETHA D.RAO – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. three writ petitions connected to land disputes involving three distinct orders. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. dispute regarding land ownership and the need for survey and record correction. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 10) |
| 3. court emphasizes the requirement of timely action by authorities in land disputes. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 12) |
| 4. protection of third-party rights where delays in administrative action occur. (Para 11 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. court issues directives on the overlap identification and future land use. (Para 16 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
ORAL COMMON ORDER
These three writ petitions are filed by the same petitioner and the disputes involved in all three writ petitions are also connected to each other and therefore, these three writ petitions are clubbed together, heard and are being disposed of by this common order.
2. The petitioner filed a writ petition in W.P.No.1870/2010 seeking a direction to the respondent authorities for effecting measurements, mapping of sub-division and apportionment of assessment in respect of the sub- divisions and further for mutations as contemplated under Rule 72 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Rules, 1966, with respect to the land purchased by the petitioner under a reg
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
