SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 8568

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
Jayant Banerji, Rajesh Rai K, JJ
DR. GAVADE ABHISHEK HANMANT – Appellant
Versus
KARNATAKA EXAMINATIONS AUTHORITY (KEA) – Respondent
WRIT PETITION NO. 7440 OF 2026 (EDN-RES)



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Abhishek Malipatil
For the Respondents: Mamata Shetty

Courts will generally not grant extensions for document submission in time-bound admission processes if the delay is not sufficiently justified and such relief would disrupt the overall counseling schedule and delay the admission process for all candidates.

Headnote:The petitioner filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a three-day extension for submitting original documents for the 4th Round (Stray Vacancy Round) of PG Medical Counselling 2025, citing inability to travel from Rajasthan due to Holi holidays. The court noted that the verification dates were 02.03.2026 and 03.03.2026, and the petitioner had signed the vakalathnama on 03.03.2026, indicating he could have submitted the documents on time. The central issue was whether the court should grant an extension for document submission in a time-bound admission process. The court reasoned that the admission process was strictly scheduled, with provisional and final results due on 06.03.2026 and 07.03.2026 respectively, and that granting relief would disrupt the entire counseling process and cause undue delay. For the reason aforesaid, we decline to interfere in this writ petition, which is therefore, dismissed

Table of Content
1. request for extension of document submission deadline based on personal travel constraints. (Para 1 , 2)
2. adherence to strict, time-bound admission schedules to prevent systemic delays in educational counseling. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. dismissal of petition when the requested relief would disrupt a time-bound administrative process. (Para 6)

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO (I). ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER DIRECTION DIRECTING RESPONDENT NO.1 TO GRANT THE PETITIONER AN EXTENSION OF THREE (3) WORKING DAYS FOR SUBMISSION OF ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS FOR THE PURPOSE OF PARTICIPATION IN THE 4TH ROUND (STRAY VACANCY ROUND) OF PG MEDICAL COUNSELLING 2025, (II). ISSUE A WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION DIRECTING RESPONDENT NO.1 TO PERMIT THE PETITIONER TO PARTICIPATE IN THE OPTION ENTRY AND COUNSELLING PROCESS FOR THE SAID ROUND, SUBJECT TO SUBMISSION OF ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS WITHIN THE EXTENDED PERIOD GRANTED BY THIS HON’BLE COURT, (III). DECLARE THAT THE PETITIONER SHALL NOT BE DISQUALIFIED OR TREATED AS INELIGIBLE FOR NON-SUBMISSION OF ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS WITHIN THE DATES 02-03-2026 OR 03-03-2026 IN VIEW OF THE CIRCUMSTANCES PLEADED HEREIN AND ETC.,

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K

ORAL ORDER

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI)

1. The sole prayer being pressed is a direction to the respondent No.1 - Karnataka Examinations Authority, KEA, to grant the petitioner an extension of three working days for submission of original documents for the purpose of participation in the 4th Round (Stray Vacancy Round) of Post Graduate Medical Counselling, 2025. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner is based in Rajasthan and he could not come to Bengaluru due to the Holi holidays.

2. It is informed by Sri.N.K.Ramesh, learned counsel appearing for the KEA, whose submission is supported by the learned Additional Government Advocate, that the verification of documents was done on 02.03.2026 and 03.03.2026 as per the notification of the KEA dated 27.02.2026 which was duly uploaded on its website. The publication of provisional results for seat allotment is required to be done tomorrow that is on 06.03.2026 and the publication of the final results of seat allotment is to be done day after tomorrow that is on 07.03.2026. It is stated by the learned counsel for the KEA that the vakalathnama was signed by the petitioner on 03.03.2026 and the affidavit to the writ petition was sworn on 04.03.2026. The petitioner could have easily come to the KEA on 03.03.2026 to submit his papers for verification of the original documents, but, he chose to file the petition on 04.03.2026 which has come up for consideration today.

3. It is also his contention that in every State across the Country, the P.G.Medical admissions are already over and the classes have started. If this petition is allowed, then it will entail a fresh round of counselling, which will delay the process even further.

4. The learned Additional Government Advocate has produced a judgment of this Court dated 25.02.2026 by means of which, we had directed the entire process of counselling to be conducted in a time-bound manner.

5. The notification issued on 27.02.2026 mentions the schedule for seat allotment, payment of fees and reporting to college for admission etc. In the facts and circumstances, granting relief to the petitioner at this stage would again open up the process of counseling and delay the conclusion of the admission process being conducted by the KEA.

6. For the reason aforesaid, we decline to interfere in this writ petition, which is therefore, dismissed

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top