2026 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 8736
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
M.NAGAPRASANNA
SHRI YOGA SAI PRAKASH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
CRL.P 12360/2023
##PAGE1##
- 1 -
NC: 2026:KHC:13051
CRL.P No. 12360 of 2023
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF MARCH, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 12360 OF 2023
BETWEEN:
SHRI YOGA SAI PRAKASH
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS
S/O VIJAYA KUMAR
R/AT NO.12/2, 5TH CROSS
M.KRISHNAPPA LAYOUT
MANGAMMANA PALYA
GANESH TEMPLE ROAD
BENGALURU SOUTH
BOMMANAHALLI
BENGALURU – 560 068.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI ANIRUDH A.KULKARNI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed
by SANJEEVINI
J KARISHETTY
Location: Hi gh 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA
Court of
Karnataka BY BOMMANAHALLI POLICE STATION
REPRESENTED BY THE S.P.P OFFICE
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
BENGALURU – 560 001.
2. PRAKASHA N.,
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
FLYING SQUAD OFFICER
WARD NO.175, BOMMANAHALLI
BENGALURU CITY
##PAGE2##- 2 -
NC: 2026:KHC:13051
CRL.P No. 12360 of 2023
HC-KAR
KARNATAKA – 560 068.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. SOWMYA R., HCGP FOR R1;
SRI S.R.DODAWAD, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO
QUASH THE CHARGE SHEET DATED 27.07.2023 FILED BY THE
BOMMANAHALLI POLICE STATION, FOR OFFENCE P/U/S 171F
OF IPC, PENDING ON THE FILE OF COURT OF THE HONBLE
CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, BENGALURU CITY IN
C.C.NO.18932/2023, ANNEXED AS ANNEXURE-C AT PAGE NOS
AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
ORAL ORDER
The petitioner – accused is before this Court calling in
question the proceedings in C.C.No.18932/2023, pending
before the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru, registered
for offences punishable under Sections 171F of the IPC.
2. Heard Sri Anirudh A. Kulkarni, learned counsel for
petitioner, Smt. Sowmya R., learned High Court Government
Pleader for respondent No.1 and Sri S..Dodawad, learned
counsel for respondent No.2.
##PAGE3##- 3 -
NC: 2026:KHC:13051
CRL.P No. 12360 of 2023
HC-KAR
3. The issue in the lis revolves around the elections for
the State Assembly which held in the month of April - May
2023. The issue is that, the petitioner has instigated the voters
to vote to a particular party, which would become an offence
under Section 171F of the IPC. A complaint comes to be
registered on 23.04.2023, not on the date of the incident, but
on the date on which the conversation is circulated / noticed on
the Facebook. The complaint becomes a crime in Crime
No.129/2023 for the offence under Section 171F of the IPC.
The police conduct investigation and file a charge sheet. Filing
of the charge sheet is what has driven the petitioner to this
Court in the subject petition.
4. Sri Anirudh A. Kulkarni, learned counsel appearing for
the petitioner submits that even the complaint did not contain a
date on which the alleged incident has happened. The
summary of the charge sheet as obtaining at column No.17,
narrates that the incident as happened on 18.03.2023 and in
which point in time, the Election Authorities had no jurisdiction
even to look into anything that surfaced either on the social
media or otherwise, as the calendar of events were notified
##PAGE4##- 4 -
NC: 2026:KHC:13051
CRL.P No. 12360 of 2023
HC-KAR
only on 29.03.2023. Learned counsel would seek quashment of
the proceedings.
5. Sri S.R.Dodawad, learned counsel for respondent No.2
would however, refute the submissions of the learned counsel
for the petitioner to contend that it is not the date on which the
incident has happened, but the date on which the conversation
has surfaced on the social media and came to the knowledge of
the flying squad and then the crime is registered. Therefore,
the police after investigation, have filed their charge sheet in
the matter. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner should
face the proceedings and come out clean in a full blown trial.
6. I have given my anxious considerations to the
submissions made by the learned counsel for the respective
parties and have perused the material on record.
7. The issue revolves around the offence under Section
171F of the IPC. Section 171F of the IPC reads as follows:
“171-F. Punishment for undue influence or
personat