SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 8856

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
M.NAGAPRASANNA
SRI GANAPATHY MANICKAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


ORAL ORDER

Heard Sri.Yeshu Mishra, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Sri.B.Pushpalatha, learned Addl. SPP appearing for respondent No.1, Smt.Shivani P. Murthy, learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos.2 and 3 and have perused the material on record.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is similarly placed to that of the accused in Crl.P.No.6306/2024 C/w Crl.P.No.6295/2024, disposed on 29.04.2025, wherein this Court has held as follows:

"8. The afore-narrated facts of relationship between the complainants/Company and the petitioners is a matter of record. The petitioners getting relieved on resignation or otherwise is also a matter of record. It would suffice if the issue in the lis is considered from registration of the complaint. Prior to registration of the subject complaint, the Company in which the petitioners were employed institutes a suit in O.S.No.3604 of 2018. The relief sought in the suit is as follows:

“WHEREFORE, the Plaintiffs in the instant case humbly pray before this Hon’ble Court that it may be pleased to pass a judgment and decree against the Defendant by:

a) Directing the Defendants to pay damages to the tune of ₹

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top