Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
R DEVDAS
SRI PRABHAKAR REDDY – Appellant
Versus
SRI RAJAGOPAL REDDY V – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the maintainability of a civil revision petition is contingent upon previous application outcomes. (Para 1) |
| 2. the petitioners are allowed to file an appeal as a subsequent course of action. (Para 2) |
ORAL ORDER
Office objection is raised regarding maintainability of the Civil Revision Petition on the ground that the application filed under Order VII Rule 11 and under Section 11 (2) of the Karnataka Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958 is partly allowed and therefore a Civil Revision Petition cannot be maintained.
2. Office objection is upheld. The Civil Revision Petition is disposed of reserving liberty to the petitioners to file an appeal.
Ordered accordingly.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
