THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
M.NAGAPRASANNA
SANTHOSHA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
WP 4477/2026
##PAGE1##
- 1 -
NC: 2026:KHC:12921
WP No. 4477 of 2026
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF MARCH, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
WRIT PETITION NO. 4477 OF 2026 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
1. SANTHOSHA
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS.
S/O LATE BACHA MOGAVEERA.
R/ATCHANDU NILAYA. HANGLOOR VILLAGE.
KUNDAPURA TALUK.
UDUPI DISTRICT 576222
2. GANESHA
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS.
S/O LATE VITTAL POOJARY.
R/A BACHI MANE. ARALAGUDDE HALEALIVE,
KOTESHWARA VILLAGE, KUNDAPURA TALUK.
UDUPI DISTRICT 576222
Digi tally
signed by
SANJEEVINI J 3. UDAYA ACHARI
KARISHETTY
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS.
Location:
S/O LATE APPU.
High Court of
Karnataka R/A KALIKAMBA NILAYA,
KUPPARU SHANKARNAYANA VILLAGE,
UDUPI DISTRICT-567227
4. JAYAPRAKASHA
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS.
S/O GOVINDA SHERIGARA,
R/AT MAKKIMANE, ULLURU MUDLUKATTE,
KANADAWARA VILLAGE, KUNDAPURA TALUK,
##PAGE2##- 2 -
NC: 2026:KHC:12921
WP No. 4477 of 2026
HC-KAR
UDUPI DISTRICT-576217
5. RAMANNA SHETTY
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,
S/O THIMAIAH SHETTY,
R/A SAHANA ESTATE, ANKADAKATTE,
KOTESHWARA VILLAGE,
KUNDAPURA TALUK,
UDUPI DISTRICT-576222.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. SOHAN B. SHETTY., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY
THE STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
BENGALURU 560001
2. HARISH R
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,
POLICE OFFICER, PSI,
(LAW AND ORDER),
KUNDAPURA POLICE STATION
UDUPI DISTRICT - 576201
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. B.N.JAGADEESHA, ADDL. SPP FOR R1)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE
CHARGE SHEET DATED 14.03.2020 IN CRIME NO.0034/2020
FILED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 POLICE FOR THE OFFENCES
PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 78, 79 AND 80 OF KARNATAKA
##PAGE3##- 3 -
NC: 2026:KHC:12921
WP No. 4477 of 2026
HC-KAR
POLICE ACT, 1963, AGAINST THE PETITIONERS HEREIN
(ANNEXURE-A)., AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
ORAL ORDER
The petitioners are before this court seeking the following
prayer:
(a) Quash the charge sheet dated 14.03.2020 in Crime
NO.0034/2020 filed by the respondent No.2 police for the
offences punishable under Sections 78, 79 & 80 of Karnataka
Police Act, 1963, against the petitioners herein (Annexure-A).
(b) Quash the entire writ proceedings initiated against
the petitioners in Crime No.0034/2020 pending on the file of
Addl. Civil Judge and JMFC, at Kundapura for the offences
punishable under Sections 78, 79 & 80 of the Karnataka Police
Act, 1963, against the petitioners herein (Annexure-B).
##PAGE4##- 4 -
NC: 2026:KHC:12921
WP No. 4477 of 2026
HC-KAR
(c) Pass any such other or further order/s that this
Hon'ble Court may deem fit under the facts and circumstances
of the above case in the interest of justice and equity.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would
submit that the issue in the lis stands covered by the judgment
rendered by a co-ordinate bench of this Court in
Crl.P.No.26024/2025 disposed on 02.09.2025, wherein it has
held as follows:
The captioned petition is filed by the petitioners seeking
quashing of the proceedings pending in C.C.No.1234/2020 for
the offences punishable under Sections 79 and 80 of the
Karnataka Police Act, 1963.
2. The gist of the prosecution’s allegation is that the
petitioners were found engaged in playing the game of andar-
bahar, pursuant to which a criminal case came to be registered.
The Investigating Officer, being of the view that the petitioners
had committed an offence, proceeded to lay a charge sheet in
C.C.No.1234/2020.
3. The issue as to whether a citizen found playing a
game of chance, namely andar-bahar, constitutes an offence
has already been considered and decided by a Coordinate
Bench in W.P.No.2227/2024. It is apposite for this Court to
reproduce paragraph 3 of the said judgment, which in turn
refers to an earlier judgment rendered in
Crl.P.No.100877/2014, and reads as follows:
"The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the
issue in the case at hand stands covered by the judgment
rendered by the co-ordinate bench of this Court in
Crl.P.No
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.