SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 9057

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
R. NATARAJ
SRI B GURUMURTHY – Appellant
Versus
SMT MANJULA P – Respondent
CRL.P 7922/2018



##PAGE1##

- 1 -

NC: 2026:KHC:13088

CRL.P No. 470 of 2019

C/W CRL.P No. 7922 of 2018

CRL.P No. 6031 of 2022

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF MARCH, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ

CRIMINAL PETITION NO.470 OF 2019

C/W

CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 7922 OF 2018

CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 6031 OF 2022

IN CRL.P NO.470/2019

BETWEEN:

SMT. VIJAYALAKSHMI

D/O. LATE H. R. NIGANNA

AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS

R/AT GURULAKSHMI NIVAS

NO.11/F, 1ST BLOCK

MADHUVANA LAYOUT

SRIRAMPURA 2ND STAGE

MYSURU DISTRICT-570 023

Digitally signed PRESENTLY R/AT: C/O H. N. KUMAR

by

MARKONAHALLI DOOR NO.116, VINAYA MARGA

RAMU PRIYA

RAMASWAMY LAYOUT

Location: HIGH

COURT OF DEVARAMNALLI BADAVANE

KARNATAKA

NANJANAGUDU TOWN

MYSURU DISTRICT-571 301

…PETITIONER

(BY SRI C. R. GOPALASWAMY, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR

SRI BHARGAV G., ADVOCATE)

AND:

SMT. MANJULA P.

ESTRANGED W/O. SRI T. BALAN

AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS

##PAGE2##

- 2 -

NC: 2026:KHC:13088

CRL.P No. 470 of 2019

C/W CRL.P No. 7922 of 2018

CRL.P No. 6031 of 2022

HC-KAR

R/AT SHREE NILAYA

PRAKASHPURAM

KETTI VILLAGE, OOTY

TAMIL NADU-643 125

…RESPONDENT

(BY SRI K. SHRIHARI, ADVOCATE)

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482

CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE PRIVATE COMPLAINT IN

P.C.R.NO.36051/2017 FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER

SECTION 494 READ WITH SECTION 34 OF IPC PENDING ON THE FILE

OF 1ST ADDITIONAL IST CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C. MYSURU, VIDE

ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.

IN CRL.P NO.7922/2018

BETWEEN:

1. SRI B. GURUMURTHY

S/O. T. BALAN

AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS

R/AT GURULAKSHMI NIVAS

NO.11/F, IST BLOCK

MADHUVANA LAYOUT

SRIRAMPURA 2ND STAGE

MYSURU-570 023

2. SRI LAKSHMINARAYANA

S/O. T. BALAN

AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS

R/AT GURULAKSHMI NIVAS

NO.11/F, IST BLOCK

MADHUVANA LAYOUT

SRIRAMPURA 2ND STAGE

MYSURU-570 023

...PETITIONERS

(BY SRI C. R. GOPALASWAMY, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR

SRI BHARGAV G., ADVOCATE)

AND:

SMT. MANJULA P.

ESTRANGED W/O. SRI. T. BALAN

##PAGE3##

- 3 -

NC: 2026:KHC:13088

CRL.P No. 470 of 2019

C/W CRL.P No. 7922 of 2018

CRL.P No. 6031 of 2022

HC-KAR

AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS

R/AT SHREE NILAYA

PRAKASHPURAM, KETTI VILLAGE

OOTY, TAMIL NADU - 643 125

...RESPONDENT

(BY SRI K. SHRIHARI, ADVOCATE)

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482

CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE PRIVATE COMPLAINT IN

P.C.R.NO.36051/2017 FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER

SECTION 494 READ WITH SECTION 34 OF IPC PENDING ON THE

FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL I CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C., MYSURU

VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.

IN CRL.P NO.6031/2022

BETWEEN:

SRI T. BALAN

S/O. SRI THIMMEGOWDA

AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS

R/AT "GURULAKSHMI NIVAS"

NO.11/F, 1ST BLOCK

MADHUVANA LAYOUT

SRIRAMPURA IIND STAGE

MYSURU-570 023

...PETITIONER

(BY SRI C. R. GOPALASWAMY, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR

SRI BHARGAV G., ADVOCATE)

AND:

SMT. MANJULA P.

ESTRANGED W/O. SRI T. BALAN

AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS

R/AT SHREE NILAYA

PRAKASHPURAM

KETTI VILLAGE, OOTY

TAMIL NADU-643 001

...RESPONDENT

(BY SRI K. SHRIHARI, ADVOCATE)

##PAGE4##

- 4 -

NC: 2026:KHC:13088

CRL.P No. 470 of 2019

C/W CRL.P No. 7922 of 2018

CRL.P No. 6031 of 2022

HC-KAR

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482

CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 01.10.2018 TAKING

COGNIZANCE AGAINST THE PETITIONER FOR THE OFFENCE

PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 494 OF IPC READ WITH SECTION 34

OF IPC AND ISSUING PROCESS IN C.C.NO.3630/2018 (ARISING

OUT OF PCR NO.3605/2017) PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE I

ADDITIONAL I CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C. MYSURU.

THESE PETITIONS, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY,

ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ

ORAL ORDER

Crl.P.No.470/2019 is filed by the accused No.4, while

Crl.P.No.7922/2018 is filed by the accused Nos.2 and 3 and

Crl.P.No.6031/2022 is filed by the accused No.1 challenging the

order dated 01.10.2018 passed by the I Additional Civil Judge

and JMFC, Mysuru (henceforth referred to as 'Trial Court') in

C.C.No.3630/2018 by which, cognizance was taken for an

offence punishable under Section 494 read with Section 34 of

IPC.

2. (i) The respondent/complainant is the wife of the

accused No.1. She filed a private complaint in PCR

No.36051/2017 contending that the accused No.1 was her

##PAGE5##

- 5 -

NC: 2026:KHC:13088

CRL.P No. 470 of 20

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top