SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 9290

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
M. Nagaprasanna, J
K Y GURUPRASAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
WRIT PETITION NO. 4606 OF 2026 (GM-RES)



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Arunachalam Shivakumar
For the Respondents: B.N. Jagadeesha

Seized property, particularly cash, should be released to the rightful owner via interim custody upon providing security and panchnama, especially when there is no rival claimant, to avoid unnecessary and prolonged police custody.

Headnote:The petition was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of the BNSS, 2023, seeking the quashing of orders that rejected the interim custody of seized cash. The facts involve the theft of a car and cash amounting to Rs. 96,96,800/- by a driver, which was subsequently recovered by the police. The court found that there was no rival claimant to the cash and the accused had admitted the petitioner's ownership. The primary issue was whether the seized cash should be released to the petitioner under Section 503 of the BNSS. The court reasoned that keeping valuable articles in police custody for extended periods is unnecessary and contrary to the principles laid down in Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai v. State of Gujarat, emphasizing that interim custody should be granted to the rightful owner upon providing adequate security and a proper panchnama to ensure the value is secured. The writ petition is allowed.

Table of Content
1. facts regarding the theft and subsequent police recovery of cash belonging to the petitioner. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. arguments concerning the lack of rival claimants and the necessity of security for release. (Para 5 , 6)
3. legal standard for interim custody of seized property to prevent prolonged police detention. (Para 7 , 8)
4. order quashing lower court decisions and allowing the release of cash subject to security. (Para 9)

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 528 OF BNSS, 2023 PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 15.12.2025 PASSED BY THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, CHITRADURGA, IN CRL.R.P.NO.108/2025, THE ORDER DATED 15.12.2025 IS HEREWITH FURNISHED AND MARKED AS ANNEXURE – A; ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION, TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 30.10.2025 PASSED BY THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHALLAKERE, IN CRIME NO.396/2025 OF CHALLAKERE POLICE STATION (C.C. NO.2274/2025), THE ORDER DATED 30.10.2025 IS HEREWITH FURNISHED AND MARKED AS ANNEXURE – B; AND CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 17/10/2025 ANNEXED AS ANNEXURE K., BY DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NO.1, TO RELEASE THE CASH AMOUNTING TO RS.96,96,800/-, SEIZED AND REPORTED UNDER PF NO.240/2025 DATED 27/08/2025 ANNEXED AS ANNEXURE F AND PF NO.238/2025 DATED 26/08/2025 ANNEXED AS ANNEXURE G IN CRIME NO.396/2025 OF CHALLAKERE POLICE STATION (C.C. NO.2274/2025), IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER HEREIN.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA

ORAL ORDER

The petitioner is before the Court seeking the following prayer:

“45. Issue a writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to quash the order dated 15.12.2025 passed by the Principal District & Sessions Judge, Chitradurga, in Crl.R.P. No.108/2025, The order dated 15.12.2025 is herewith furnished and marked as Annexure - A

46. Issue a writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, to quash the order dated 30.10.2025 passed by the Principal Civil Judge & JMFC, Challakere, in Crime No.396/2025 of Challakere Police Station (C.C. No.2274/2025), The order dated 30.10.2025 is herewith furnished and marked as Annexure- B.

47. And consequently allow the application filed by the Petitioner dated 17/10/2025 annexed as Annexure K., by directing the Respondent No. 1, to release the cash amounting to Rs.96,96,800/-, seized and reported under PF No.240/2025 dated 27/08/2025 annexed as Annexure-F and PF No.238/2025 dated 26/08/2025 annexed as Annexure G in Crime No.396/2025 of Challakere Police Station (C.C. No.2274/2025), in favour of the Petitioner herein.

48. Grant such other and further reliefs as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in the interests of justice and equity.”

2. Heard Sri Arunachalam Shivakumar, learned counsel for petitioner and Sri B.N.Jagadeesha, learned Additional State Public Prosecutor for the respondent.

3. The story would commence from the journey of the petitioner and his wife in a Car, which undertook from Bangalore to Bellary to register a land and to finalise the marriage arrangements of their daughter. They stopped at Udupi Garden Hotel, at Challakere, finished their lunch and when they come back to the Car, neither the Car, nor the cash that was in the Car found and the driver was also found absconding. Immediately a complaint comes to be registered in Crime No.396/2025. The very next two days, i.e., on 26.08.2025 and 27.08.2025, the police trace out the driver, seized the cash and registered the recovered cash in P.F.Nos.238 and 240 of 2025. Seizure of the cash is reported to the learned Magistrate on 27.08.2025.

4. The petitioner then files an application under Section 503 of the BNSS seeking interim custody of the seized cash. On 21.10.2025,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top