SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 9385

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
MR H NARASIMHA MURTHY SINCE DECEASED BY LRS – Appellant
Versus
MR K LAKSHMINARAYANA S/O H. KADA SETTY – Respondent
RFA 9/2012



IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM RFA NO. 9 OF 2012 (PAR)

BETWEEN:

MR. H. NARASIMHA MURTHY SINCE DECEASED BY LRS

1 . SMT. M.P MANJULA W/O H. NARASIMHA MURTHY AGED 59 YEARS

2 . SMT. GEETHA RASHMI H.N D/O H. NARASIMHA MURTHY AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS

3 . MR. SACHIN H.N S/O H. NARASIMHA MURTHY AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS ALL ARE R/AT 943, 42ND CROSS

3RD BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR BANGALORE-560 010.

...APPELLANTS (BY SRI. C.S. PRASANNA KUMAR, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1 . MR. K. LAKSHMINARAYANA S/O H. KADA SETTY SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS (A) SMT. SARASWATHI W/O LATE K. LAKSHMINARAYANA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS R/AT MUDUVAGALAIAH STREET MUDIPETTE CROSS, CHANNAPATNA RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-571501.

(B) MR. L. RAVI S/O LATE LAKSHMINARAYANA MAJOR MUTHKUR VILLAGE, M.N. SANDRA POST HUNUGOHALLI HOBLI HOSKOTE TALUK-562114.

(C) SMT. L. RAJANI D/O LATE K. LAKSHMINARAYANA MAJOR R/AT SHRI SRINIVAS TRADERS MANDIPET, CHANNAPATNA-571 501.

(D) SMT. L. ROOPA D/O LATE LAKSHMINARAYANA MAJOR R/AT NO.3660-C, 4TH MAIN ROAD B BLOCK, SUBRAMANYANAGAR RAJAJINAGAR II STAGE BANGALORE-560021.

2 . SRI. K.A. KADA SETTY SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS (A) SMT. CHANNAMMA @

BHAGYALAKSHMI D/O LATE H. KADA SETTY AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS R/AT NO.534, 10TH E MAIN ROAD

6TH BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR BANGALORE-560010.

(B) SMT. VARALAKSHMI D/O LATE H. KADA SETTY AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS R/AT 175, LIG, B CROSS KABIR MUTT, KENGARI UPPANAGAR BANGALORE-560060 SINCE DECEASED BY HER LRs (B)(I) MR. RAGHU AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS (B)(II) SMT. MEGHANA AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS (B)(III) SMT. SHASHI KANTH AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS (B)(IV) SMT. PADMA W/O NAGENDRA .B.G AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS ALL ARE R/AT NO.562

6TH MAIN ROAD, 1ST CROSS K.C.H.S LAYOUT, DODDABASTI MAIN ROAD, BHUVANESHWARI NAGAR, BENGALURU-560 56.

(C) SMT. JAYAMMA D/O LATE H. KADA SETTY SINCE DECEASED BY LRS (C)(I) MR. K. PARTHA MAJOR (C)(II) MR. K. CHANDRA MAJOR BOTH ARE R/AT 175, LIG, B CROSS KABIR MUTT, KENGERI UPPANAGARA BANGALORE-560 060.

SMT. KAMALAMMA W/O LATE H. KADA SETTY SINCE DECEASED BY HER LRS WHO ARE ALREADY PARTIES

3 . MR. H. LAKSHMANA S/O LATE HUTCHE THIMMAIAH MAJOR R/AT NO.619/H, 36TH CROSS

2ND BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR BANGALORE-560010.

4 . MR. G. DAYANAND S/O GIRIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.42, 16TH CROSS

8TH MAIN, MALLESWARAM BANGALORE-560055.

5 . SMT. NINGAMMA W/O BORE GOWDA MAJOR

6 . SRI. H.B. THAMMANNA S/O BORE GOWDA MAJOR

7 . SRI. LAKSHMAMMA W/O VENKATARAMU MAJOR R6 TO R8 ARE RESIDING AT HALLEGERE GRAMA VASARALU HOBLI MANDYA TALUK AND DISTRICT-571 416.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. Y. HARIPRASAD, ADVOCATE FOR R2(A AND B) R2(B)(I-IV)

AND R2(C)(I AND II);

SRI. R. VIDYASAGAR AND SRI. RAGHAVENDRA .K, ADVOCATES FOR R1( A TO D);

SRI. G. SUKUMARAN AND SRI. CHETAN .B, ADVOCATES FOR R4;

SRI. UMESH .C AND SRI. ANANTHAPADMANABHA .G.N, ADVOCATES FOR R6 AND R7;

R3 IS SERVED;

V/O DATED 22.08.2022, APPEAL IS ABATED IN RESPECT OF DECEASED R5)

THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 30.11.2010 PASSED IN O.S.2282/1996 ON THE FILE OF THE I-ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESSION.

THIS RFA HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED FOR JUDGMENT ON 09.02.2026, THIS DAY JUDGMENT WAS PRONOUNCED THEREIN, AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM C.A.V. JUDGMENT The captioned appeal is preferred by the legal heirs of the defendant No.3 calling in question the legality and correctness of the preliminary decree passed in O.S. No.2282/1996, wherein the suit instituted by the original plaintiff for partition and separate possession came to be decreed, granting him 7/24th share in the suit schedule properties.

2. For the sake of brevity, the parties are referred to as per their rank before the trial Court.

3. Family tree is as under:

H. KADA SETTY (FIRST DEFENDANT)

KAMALAMMA K.LAKSHMI BHAGYA VARALAXMI JAYAMMA N.NARASIMHA (WIFE) NARAYANA (1ST dtr.) (2nd dtr) (3rd dtr.) MURTHY (Plaintiff) (3rd Defendant)

4. The facts, in brief, leading to the fi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top