SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 9478

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
E.S.INDIRESH
SMT. SHAKEELA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
WP 3886/2026



IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.3886 OF 2026 (CS-RES)

BETWEEN:

1. SMT. SHAKEELA, W/O. ASHOKA AMIN, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/AT. 1-163(2), SHRI SAI DURGA, KUTHYADI HOUSE, IRUVAIL VILLAGE ABD POST, MANGALURU - 574 144.

…PETITIONER (BY SMT./KUM. SHWETHA NAYAK N., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. DHANANJAY KUMAR, ADVOCATE)

AND:

Digitally signed 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA by CHAYA S A REPRESENTED BY ITS Location: HIGH COURT OF PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATION, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560001.

CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, MANGALORE SUB-DIVISION.

MANGALURU, DAKSHINA KANNADA - 575001.

3. THE HOSABETTU SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY, (REGISTERED UNDER CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT, 1956)

REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER HOSABETTU, MOODABIDRI, MANGALURU - 574227.

4. SRI. HARIAPPA P.

S/O. RUKKAYYA POOJARY, AGED : MAJOR R/AT. RENJARAKODI, PUCHAMOGARU VILLAGE AND POST, MOODABIDRI, MANAGALURU-574227.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. YOGESH D. NAIK, AGA FOR R1 & R2;

SRI. K. CHANDRANATH ARIGA, ADVOCATE FOR C/R3)

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 29.12.2025 IN APPLICATION NO. 01/2017-18 SOCIETIES i.e., RESPONDENT NO.2 VIDE ANNEXURE-A.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH

ORAL ORDER

The petitioner in this writ petition is assailing the proceedings initiated under Section 69 of the Karnataka Co-Operative Societies Act, 1959. A perusal of Section 105(f) of the said Act provides for an appeal to the Tribunal.

In that view of the matter, and reserving liberty to the petitioner to approach the competent authority/Tribunal, this writ petition is not maintainable. All contentions of the parties are kept open.

Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed SD/-

(E.S.INDIRESH)

JUDGE SB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 10

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top