SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 10740

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
R. NATARAJ
MOHAMMED AGSAR – Appellant
Versus
MR.M.K.VENKATACHALAPATHY – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 730 OF 2023 (SP)

BETWEEN:

1. MOHAMMED AGSAR S/O MOHAMMED DASTIGIR, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/AT NO.13, 8TH CROSS, PADARAYANAPURA, BENGALURU-560026.

2. VAZIR AHMED S/O MOHAMMED DASTIGIR AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/AT NO.13-G, 8TH CROSS, PADARAYANAPURA, BENGALURU-560026.

…APPELLANTS (BY SRI. ZAMEER PASHA, ADVOCATE)

Digitally AND:

signed by SUMA MR. M.K.VENKATACHALAPATHY Location:

S/O M.N. KRISHNAIAH SETTY, HIGH COURT OF AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, KARNATAKA R/AT NO.6/1, E NO. 3RD STREET, NANDARAM SINGH LANE CROSS, BENGALURU-560001.

…RESPONDENT (BY SRI. DHIRAJ A.K., ADVOCATE)

THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 27.10.2021 PASSED IN OS.NO.6334/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE XXXIX ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE CITY, DECREEING SUIT FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE.

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FURTHER ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ

ORAL JUDGMENT

This appeal is filed by the defendants in O.S No.6334/2013 on the file of XXXIX Additional City Civil Ju

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top