2026 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 10853
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
CHIEF JUSTICE AND C.M. POONACHA
JAGADISH POOJARY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
WP 3922/2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA WRIT PETITION NO. 3922 OF 2024 (GM-MM-S)
BETWEEN:
1. JAGADISH POOJARY S/O SHEENAPPA POOJARY AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS BALYA HOUSE, BANNURU VILLAGE KAGEKHANA POST BANTWALA TALUK DAKSHINA KANNADA - 574 253
2. UMESH KOTIAN S/O SANJEEVA POOJARY AGED 43 YEARS GANADAPALE HOUSE Digitally signed by BARIMANNU VILLAGE SRIDEVI S KAGE KHANA POST Location: BANTWALA TALUK High Court DAKSHINA KANNADA - 574 253 of Karnataka
3. JAYANTHA S/O LAXMANA POOJARY AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS MULIBAILU HOUSE KAGEKHANA POST BANTWALA TALUK D.K. - 574 258
4. CHANDRAHASA S/O RAMA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
2-53 A1, MADHUGIRI HOUSE KAGEKHANA POST BANTWALA TALUK D.K. - 574 253
5. KESHAVA S/O ITHAPPA POOJARY AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS ALAITTIMARU HOUSE BARIMANNU VILLAGE KAGEKHANA POST BANTWALA TALUK D.K. - 574 253
6. MOHANDAS S/O BALAPPA POOJARY AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS
1-94, BARIMARU PADE MANE BARIMARU VILLAGE KAGEKHANA POST BANTWALA TALUK DAKSHINA KANNADA - 574 253 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI KARUNAKARA P., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU - 560 001
2. THE COMMISSIONER MINIES AND ZEOLOGY KHANIJA BHAVAN RACE COURSE ROAD BENGALURU - 560 001
3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER MANGALURU DISTRICT STATE BANK MANGALURU - 560 001
4. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER MANGALURU DISTRICT STATE BANK MANGALURU - 560 001
5. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR MINES AND ZEOLOGY STATE BANK MANGALURU - 560 001
6. CHANDRAHASA S/O NONU MULYA
1-6, PALLIPADI HOUSE POLALI POST KARIYANGALA VILLAGE BANTWAL TALUK …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. NILOUFER AKBAR, AGA FOR R-1 TO 5;
SRI P.P. HEGDE, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SRI AKSHAY KUMAR JAIN, ADVOCATE FOR R-6)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND
227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO CANCEL LICENSE ISSUED TO THE RESPONDENT No.6 WHICH IS AT ANNEXURE-A & ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA
ORAL ORDER
(PER: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE)
1. The petitioners have filed the present petition as Public Interest Litigation [PIL], inter alia, praying as under: "a) Issue writ of mandamus directing the Respondents to cancel license issued to the Respondent No.6 which is at Annexure A.
b) Consider the Representations given by the petitioners to the Deputy Commissioners produced at Annexure B and C c) Direct the Respondents No.3 and 5 to take action against the Respondent No.6 for illeal sand mines during the month of December.
d) Grant such other and further relief's as this Hon'ble court deems fit in the interest of justice and equity."
2. The petitioners allege that illegal sand mining is being carried on in the Nethravathi River. The petitioners allege that, contrary to the Rules and Regulations, the mining lease holders have levelled and cleared motorable access up to the banks of the river and are carrying on sand mining activities through mechanised means. The petitioners also allege that sand mining is being carried out through boats and barges, which, according to the petitioners, is impermissible. The petitioners have also annexed photographs to the petition, which show certain boats on the river allegedly engaged in sand mining. Additionally, there are photographs which show mounds of sand stacked at the edge of the river and the same being loaded by a JCB onto lorries.
3. The petitioners have also produced photographs showing that sand is being transported on uncovered trucks and lorries. The petitioners allege that, as a result of extensive sand mining and the transportation of sand in uncovered trucks, the area has become highly polluted and is very difficult for persons to live in.
4. Given the allegations made in the present petition, we had requested