SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 10958

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV
UNION OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
WP 788/2023



IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 788 OF 2023 (LA-RES)

BETWEEN:

UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER (CONSTRUCTION-IV), SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY, CANTONMENT RAILWAY STATION, NO.18, MILLERS ROAD, BANGALORE- 560 046 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. CHANDRACHUD A., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY Digitally signed by VIJAYA P THE SPECIAL LAND Location: HIGH ACQUISITION OFFICER, COURT OF KARNATAKA H.R.P.-II, HASSAN- 573 201.

2. SMT. MANNAMMA W/O LATE GUNDEGOWDA, SINCE DEAD BY LRS, 2(A) RAMACHANDRA G., S/O LATE J. GUNDEGOWDA AND LATE MANNAMMA, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, RESIDING AT GAVENAHALLI, HASSAN - 573201.

2(B) SMT. DAVEERAMMA, D/O LATE J. GUNDEGOWDA AND LATE MANNAMMA, W/O SRI. S.R. HOPANNA, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, RESIDING AT DODDAPURA POST, KASABA HOBLI, SANKENAHALLI VILLAGE, HASSAN TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT-573118.

2(C) SMT. SANNAMMA, D/O LATE J. GUNDEGOWDA AND LATE MANNAMMA, W/O SRI. BASAVARAJU, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, RESIDING AT DUDDA HOBLI, THIMMENAHALLI GRAMA, KITTANKERE, HASSAN-573162.

2(D) SMT. LEELAMMA, D/O LATE J. GUNDEGOWDA AND LATE MANNAMMA, W/O SRI. K. THIMMEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.449, B. KATEHALLI, KOPPAL, GAVENAHALLI POST, KASABA HOBLI, HASSAN-573201.

2(E) SRI. JAGADEESHA, S/O LATE J. GUNDEGOWDA AND LATE MANNAMMA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.67, RAJARAJESHWARI NAGAR, RAMAKRISHNA NAGAR, MYSURU-570022.

2(F) SMT. MOHANAKSHI G., D/O LATE J. GUNDEGOWDA AND LATE MANNAMMA, W/O SRI. J.R. MANJUNATHA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, RESIDING AT SRIRANGA GOWTHAM NILAYA, 3RD CROSS, 12TH MAIN ROAD, HEMAVATHI NAGARA, HASSAN-573201. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. A.S. HARISH, AGA FOR R1;

SRI. SHESHADRI B.T., ADVOCATE FOR R2(A TO F))

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED JUDGEMENT AND AWARD DATED 07.01.2016 IN LAC. NO.5/2011 PASSED BY THE HON'BLE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM AT HASSAN AS PER ANNEXURE-A AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV

ORAL ORDER

I.A.No.1/2023 has been filed seeking to bring the legal representatives of deceased respondent No.2 on record. In light of the averments made out, the application is allowed and the legal representatives of deceased respondent No.2 are permitted to come on record. Petitioner is permitted to carry out the amendment. Learned counsel Sri. Sheshadri B.T. submits that application may be allowed and he would appear for the legal representatives.

The matter is taken up by consent of both parties.

2. Learned counsel for the legal representatives of respondent No.2 submits that matter may be disposed of in terms of the order passed in W.P.No.4092/2023.

3. It is noticed that the present petition has been filed by the beneficiary seeking to set aside the judgment and award passed in LAC.No.5/2011, which is an award passed as regards the reference under Section 18(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short 'the Act'). It is the contention of the counsel that the petitioner being beneficiary ought to have been made parties.

4. Perused the order passed in W.P.No.4092/2023.

The observations made are as follows:

"The petitioner – Union of India represented by Deputy Chief Engineer (Construction-IV), South Western Railway which is the beneficiary has challenged the correctness of the Award passed by the learned II Additional Senior Civil Judge & J.M.F.C., at Hassan (for short “Trial Court”) in LAC No.128/2013, whereby the Trial Court has allowed the reference under Section 18 (1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and enhanced the compensation.

2. It is the submission that the Railways being the beneficiary is a necessary party and the land having been acquired for the purpose of Hassan-Bangalore Railway Project, for which purpose Preliminary Notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 havi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top