SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 12288

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
H T NARENDRA PRASAD
SREENI S – Appellant
Versus
REGIONAL DIRECTOR KKR – Respondent
WP 28643/2025



IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 28643 OF 2025 (S-RES)

BETWEEN:

SREENI S S/O SOMAN AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS NO. 19-60/76B NEDUMPALANJI VEEDU PANAVILAI, KOLLEMCODE, VILAVANCODE KANYAKUMARI, TAMIL NADU-629160.

…PETITIONER (BY *SMT. MEENAKSHI A N, ADVOCATE FOR SMT. SHRAVANI SHARMA., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1. REGIONAL DIRECTOR KKR STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION

1ST FLOOR, “E” WING. KENDRIYA SADAN KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU Digitally signed by KARNATAKA-560034.

MALATHI CHALUVA IYENGAR

2. THE MEMBER OF RECRUITMENT BOARD Location: HIGH COURTOF CRPF PALLIPURAM GROUP CENTRE KARNATAKA CRPF PALLIPURAM THIRUVANANTHAPURAM KERALA-695316.

3. DIRECTORATE GENERAL (DIG)

CUM APPELLATE AUTHORITY SUB RRC AT GC CRPF PPM(PALLIPURAM)

(PET/PST BOARD) RECRUITMENT OF CT (GD)

IN CAPFS, SSF AND RIFEMAN(GD)

ASSAM RIFLES EXAM 2025 CRPF PALLIPURAM GROUP EXAM CENTRE *Corrected vide Chamber order dated: 27.02.2026 CRPF PALLIPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM KERALA-695316.

4. STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION BLOCK NO. 12, CGO COMPLEX LODHI ROAD, NEW DELHI-110003.

5. DIRECTORATE GENERAL CRPF (RECRUITMENT BRANCH)

EAST BLOCK-07, LEVEL-4, SECTOR-01 R.K. PURAM, NEW DELHI-110066 (MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS).

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. A CHANDRACHUD., CGSPC. FOR R1 TO R5)

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED: 26.08.2025 AT ANNEXURE-F AND G PASSED BY THE R-2 AND 3 HEREIN AND DIRECT THE R-1 TO CONSIDER THE PETITIONER AS HAVING QUALIFIED WITH THE MINIMUM PHYSICAL STANDARDS AS FAR AS THE HEIGHT IS CONCERNED BASED ON THE PHYSICAL FITNESS CERTIFICATE AT ANNEXURE-J AND J1 AND PREVIOUS YEARS SLIP-ON QUALIFICATION ON HEIGHT ISSUED BY THE R-2 AT ANNEXURE-H AND ETC.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD

ORAL ORDER

This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 26.08.2025, vide Annexures F and G, passed by respondent Nos. 2 and 3 respectively, whereby the height of the petitioner has been measured as 169.4 cms and 169.3 cms, whereas the qualifying height prescribed for male candidates is 170 cms. Hence, his case was not considered for appointment as Constable.

2. The respondent–Central Government issued a notification dated 05.09.2024, vide Annexure-A, inviting applications for the post of Constable (GD) in the Central Armed Police Forces. Pursuant to the said notification, the petitioner applied for the said post. As per the notification, the selection process consists of three stages: (i) Computer- Based Examination, (ii) Physical Standard Test (PST) / Physical Efficiency Test (PET), and (iii) Medical Examination /

Document Verification.

3. The petitioner successfully cleared the Computer-

Based Examination and was consequently permitted to participate in the Physical Standard Test. As per the notification, the minimum height prescribed for male candidates is 170 cms. The respondents measured the height of the petitioner using a Radio Frequency Identification Device, which is a digital equipment for height measurement. As per Annexure-F, the petitioner’s height was measured as 169.4 cms. On the same day, the petitioner preferred an appeal before the appellate authority. As per Annexure-G, upon re-measurement by the appellate authority, the petitioner’s height was recorded as 169.3 cms.

4. Since the petitioner was declared unsuccessful in the Physical Standard Test, his candidature was not considered further. Thereafter, the petitioner underwent medical examination at certain private hospitals, wherein his height was measured as 171 cms, as evidenced by Annexure-J. Another certificate, produced as Annexure-J1, shows that upon examination at Kanniyakumari Medical College, the petitioner’s height was again measured as 171 cms. Hence, the petitioner has filed the present writ petition ch

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top