IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16^TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 4971 OF 2026 (CS-RES)

BETWEEN:

SRI. NURALESHWARA FISHERMAN CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD., HUSKURU HADI VILLAGE KANDALIGE HOBLI, SARAGURU TALUK MYSURU DISTRICT- 571121 REPRESENTED BY ITS CEO REGISTERED UNDER KARNATAKA CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY ACT 1959 …PETITIONER Digitally signed by KIRAN (BY SRI. SANDESH T.B., ADVOCATE)

KUMAR R Location:

HIGH COURT AND:

OF KARNATAKA

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATION, MS BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY

2. THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES MYSURU SUB-DIVISION MYSURU-570001

3. THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, HUNSURU SUB-DIVISION, HUNSURU TALUK, MYSURU-571105

4. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF FISHERIES DEPARTMENT H.D KOTE SUB- DIVISION H.D KOTE TALUK MYSURU DISTRIC-571114 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. YOGESH D NAIK, AGA)

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 22.01.2026 IN ORDER BEARING NO. AR43/RSR/AMD/08/2025-26 PASSED BY THE R3 VIDE ANNX-G.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI

ORAL ORDER

1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition challenging the order dated 22.01.2026 passed by respondent No.3 vide Annexure-G, wherein respondent No.3 has passed an order to withdraw the approved amended bye-laws.

2. Brief facts, leading rise to the filing of this petition are as follows:

3. The petitioner's Society is a registered Society under the Karnataka Cooperative Societies Act, 1959 (for short, ‘the Act’). The petitioner's Society convened its annual general body meeting on 20.09.2025. The petitioner convened a special general body meeting on 22.12.2025, wherein the members unanimously resolved to exclude the villagers of Bettadapura, Haleyuru, Saraguru, M.C.Tholalu and Siddapura from the area of operation of the Society, as the residents of the said villages do not pursue fishing as their profession. The members unanimously resolved to amend certain bye-laws of Society on 29.12.2025. The petitioner submitted a representation for approval of the proposed amended bye-laws. On the requisition and the resolution submitted by the petitioner, respondent No.3 passed an order dated 05.01.2026 approving the amendment of the bye- laws submitted by the petitioner. Thereafter, respondent No.3, without issuing any notice or holding an enquiry, recalled the order of approval of amended bye-laws by issuing the impugned order.

Hence, this petition.

4. Heard the arguments of the learned counsel for the petitioner, and learned Government Advocate for the respondents.

5. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has submitted an application for approval of the proposed amended bye-laws.

Respondent No.3 approved the proposed amended bye-laws on 05.01.2026. Respondent No.3, without issuing any notice or holding an enquiry, unilaterally recalled the order of approval vide order dated 22.01.2026. Thus, the impugned order is in violation of the principles of natural justice. Hence, he prays for allowing the writ petition.

6. Per contra, learned Additional Government Advocate fairly concedes that before passing the impugned order, no notice was issued nor an enquiry was conducted. He submits that if a reasonable time is granted, the respondents would reconsider the matter, and pass an appropriate order in accordance with law.

7. Perused the records, and considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the respective parties.

8. It is undisputed that the petitioner Society is a registered Society under the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959. The petitioner's Society convened an Annual General Body meeting, and passed a resolution to amend the by-laws of the Society. They sent the proposed amended bye-laws to respondent No.3