SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 13020

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
RAVI V HOSMANI
SHRI INNAYATHULLA – Appellant
Versus
SRI SHAMEEM AHMED – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1503 OF 2025 (INJ)

BETWEEN:

SRI INNAYATHULLA, S/O LATE ABDUL SHUKOOR, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/A KOMBAGUDDE, MALLAR VILLAGE AND POST, UDUPI TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT - 576 101.

…APPELLANT [BY SRI PRADEEP KUMAR R H., ADVOCATE (PH)]

AND:

1. SRI SHAMEEM AHMED, Digitally signed by S/O SABU SAHEB, GEETHAKUMARI AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, PARLATTAYA S Location: Hi gh R/A KOMBAGUDDE, Court of MALLAR VILLAGE AND POST, Karnataka UDUPI TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT - 576 101.

LATE AMEER ADAM, (SINCE DECEASED IS REP BY LRs FROM 2 TO 7)

2. SMT. NOORUNISSA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, 3. SRI PARVEZ, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, 4. SRI FAZILATH, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, 5. SMT. FARIYAL BANU, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, 6. SMT. FAMIA BANU, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, 7. SRI MOHAMMED FAZIL, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, NO. 2 TO 7 ARE R/A AA MANZIL, NEAR KOMBAGUDDE MAZID, MALLAR VILLAGE, KAUP TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT - 576 101.

…RESPONDENTS THIS RSA IS FILED U/S. 100 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 26.06.2025 PASSED IN RA NO.48/2024 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ACJM, UDUPI, D

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top