SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 13172

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
SMT RUKMINI – Appellant
Versus
SRI J THRILOKA MURTHY – Respondent


HC-KAR IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 869 OF 2010 (DEC/INJ)

C/W REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1180 OF 2009 (DEC/INJ)

IN RFA No. 869/2010 BETWEEN:

1. SMT RUKMINI SINCE DECEASED REP. BY HER LRs

1(A) ANJANAPPA S/O LATE MUNISHAMAPPA AGED 78 YEARS 1(B) SMT. UMA W/O VENKATESH AGED 48 YEARS BOTH ARE R/AT NO.1091 Digitally signed 23RD MAIN ROAD, 23RD CROSS by CHAITHRA A Location: HIGH HSR LAYOUT, SECTOR-2 COURT OF KARNATAKA BENGALURU-560 102.

1(C) PRASANTH .A S/O ANJANAPPA AGED 46 YEARS R/AT NO. 99, 28TH MAIN ROAD

18TH CROSS, HSR LAYOUT SECTOR-2, BENGALURU-560 102.

1(D) RAVINDRA .A S/O ANJANAPPA AGED 44 YEARS HC-KAR R/AT NO.19, 26TH MAIN NEAR HSR LAYOUT POLICE STATION HSR LAYOUT, SECTOR-1 BENGALURU-560 102.

[CAUSE TITLE AMENDED V/O/D 07.09.2023]

…APPELLANTS (BY SRI. B. RAMESH, ADVOCATE FOR LRs OF APPELLANT)

AND:

1. SRI. J. THRILOKA MURTHY S/O LATE JAYRAM AGED 56 YEARS R/AT PANNATHUR VILLAGE PANNATHUR POST, BANGALORE-560087.

…RESPONDENT (BY SRI. VIVEK S. REDDY, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SRI. V. VISHWANATH, ADVOCATE)

THIS RFA IS FILED U/ORDER 41 RULE 1 R/W SEC 96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top