IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21^ST DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 14171 OF 2025 BETWEEN:

MR. SUBHAM JOBANPUTRA AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS S/O MANOJ KUMAR JOBANPUTRA, 1 GC.381, F- SECTOR, NEAR ISRO, VTC BHOPAL, PO-AYODHA NAGAR MADGYA PRADESH - 462 041.

…PETITIONER (BY SRI. ANKUR TRIPATHI, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA Digitally BY CENTRAL CEN CRIME POLICE STATION signed by SANJEEVINI J FIRST FLOOR, HALASURU GATE KARISHETTY POLICE STATION PREMISES, Location:

High Court of OPPOSITE BBMP HEAD OFFICE, Karnataka HUDSON CIRCLE, BENGALURU - 560 002 REP. BY SPP, HIGH COURT BUILDING, BENGALURU - 560 001.

2. SHASHANKAGOWDA N.P.

SON OF PAPANNA AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, RESIDING AT LEMON PEAK MARKETING SERVICE, NO.13/14, 2ND UNITY BUILDING, BENGALURU - 560 002.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K. NAGESHWARAPPA, HCGP FOR R1; SRI. PAWAN KUMAR M.N, ADVOCATE FOR R2)

THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.PC (FILED U/S 528 BNNS) PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED FIR COMPLAINT (ANNEXURE-A AND B) AND THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN CC NO.31529/2025 PENDING BEFORE THE HONBLE XLV ADDL.CJM AT BENGALURU (ANNEXURE-C AND D) ARISEN OUT OF CR NO.159/2024 BEFORE THE CENTRAL CEN CRIME POLICE STATION I.E. RESPONDENT NO.1 FOR OFFENCES P/U/S 66 OF THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACT 2000.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA

ORAL ORDER

The petitioner is before this Court seeking the following prayer:

"To quash the impugned FIR, complaint (Annexure-'A' and 'B') and the entire proceedings in C.C.No.31529 of 2025 pending before the Hon'ble XLV Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Bangalore (Annexure-C and D) arisen out of Cr.No.159/2024 before the Central CEN Crime Police Station i.e., Respondent No.1 for offences punishable under Section 66 of the Information Technology Act, 2000, in the interest of justice and equity."

2. Heard Sri. Ankur Tripathi, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Sri. K Nageshwarappa, learned HCGP appearing for respondent No.1, Sri. Pawan Kumar M.N., learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2 and have perused the material on record.

3. During the pendency of the proceedings, the parties to the lis have settled the dispute among themselves and have filed joint affidavit. The Joint affidavit reads as follows:

"JOINT AFFIDAVIT We, Mr. Subham Jobanputra, aged about 30 years, S/o Manoj Kumar Jobanputra, R/at B-520, 5^th Floor, RR Residency, Hosapalya Main Road, Bangalore-560 048 the petitioner and Mr.Shashankagowda N P Son of Mr.Papanna, Aged about 28 years, Address at: Lemon Peak Marketing Service, No.14/14, 2^nd Unity Building, Bengaluru 560 002 hereby solemnly affirm and state on oath as follows:

1. That we state that we are the petitioner and respondent No.2 respectively in the above Criminal Petition. We are well acquainted with the facts and circumstances of the case and hence competent to swear to this Joint Affidavit.

2. I, the Respondent No.2, state that I had lodged a complaint on 07.03.2024, pursuant to which an FIR came to be registered in Crime No.159/2024 before the Central CEN Crime Police Station, Bengaluru, for the offences punishable under Sections 66 and 66D of the Information Technology Act, 2000 and Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code against the petitioner herein. I further state that the respondent No.1 Police, after investigation, have filed a charge sheet in C.C.No.31529/2025 on the file of the Hon'ble XLV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru, only for the offence punishable under Section 66 of the Information Technology Act,2000.

3. That the petitioner and respondent No.2 state that all disputes and differences arising out of the aforesaid complaint have been amicably settled between them out of free will, without any force, coercion or undue influence. The respondent No.2 has voluntarily agreed to resolve the matter and forego all past grievances arising out of the sub