SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 13239

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
H.P.SANDESH AND VENKATESH NAIK T
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Appellant
Versus
THOUSIF @ ABUBAKER SIDDIQ – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1892 OF 2018 (A)

BETWEEN:

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY POLICE INSPECTOR PANAMBUR POLICE STATION REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDING BENGALURU-560 001.

…APPELLANT (BY SMT. RASHMI PATEL, H.C.G.P.)

AND:

1. THOUSIF @ ABUBAKER SIDDIQ S/O. LATE M. AHAMED AGED 28 YEARS RESIDING AT HOUSE NO.8/127 D igitally KANA, INDIRA KATTE, SURATHKAL POST signed by ANJALI M MANGALURU-575 014.

Location:

High Court 2. ZUBEDA of W/O. LATE KHASIM Karnataka AGED 44 YEARS RESIDING AT SUNDARA APARTMENT

1ST FLOOR, DOOR NO.101 BRITTO LANE, FALNIR MANGALURU-575 001.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI KETHAN KUMAR, ADVOCATE, FOR SRI ABHISHEK MARLA, FOR R-1, AND SMT. POOJA KATTIMANI, ADVOCATE, FOR SRI DINESH KUMAR K. RAO, FOR R-2)

THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 378(1) AND (3) OF THE CR.P.C. PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 26-4-2018 PASSED IN SPECIAL CASE NO.87 OF 2014 ON THE FILE OF II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS (SPECIAL) JUDGE, D.K., MANGALURU, IN SO FAR AS IT RELATES TO ACQUITTING RESPONDEN

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top