SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 13291

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
M.NAGAPRASANNA
MR ROSHAN THAKUR – Appellant
Versus
STATE BY EAST CEN CRIME (CYBER CRIME BANGALORE ) – Respondent
CRL.P 5164/2023



IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 5164 OF 2023 BETWEEN:

1. MR ROSHAN THAKUR AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS.

S/O SHRI. SHOBHIT THAKUR, R/O NO A-284, 3RD FLOOR, DEEP VIHAR, PANSALI, NEXT TO SECTOR - 24, ROHINI, DELHI - 110 042 2. MR HANSRAJ AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS S/O SHRI BHAG CHAND Digitally signed by R/O J- 3RD 341, SANJEEVINI J KARISHETTY JJ COLONY Location: H igh WAJRIPUR, DELHI - 110052 Court of Karnataka …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SUKUMARAN G., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1. STATE BY EAST CEN CRIME (CYBER CRIME BANGALORE )

REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDING BENGALURU - 560 001

2. DR MAHALAKSHMI ATREYI D/O S PARAMESWARAN AGED ABOUT 87 YEARS R/O B 302, SUNANDA RESIDENCY, 39/24, DOMLUR LAYOUT, BENGALURU - 560 071 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B.N. JAGADEESH, ADDL. SPP FOR R1 R2 IS SERVED)

THIS CRL.P. IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN CR.NO.92/2022 DATED 24.02.2022 P/U/S 66(C) AND (D) OF THE I.T. ACT AND R/W SEC.420 R/W 34 OF IPC FILED BY THE EAST CEN CRIME (CYBER CRIME BENGALURU) P.S. BENGALURU PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE 1ST A.C.M.M COURT AT BENGALURU CITY AS PER THIS PETITIONER NO.1 AND 2 ARE CONCERNED.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA

ORAL ORDER

The learned Addl. SPP submits that the investigation by the police has ended in a 'C' report.

2. In that light, the petition stands disposed deserving liberty to the petitioner to knock at the doors of this Court in the event of any oppose.

3. With the aforesaid observations, the petition stands disposed.

4. In view of disposal of the petition, pending application does not survive for consideration. Accordingly, the same is disposed of.

Sd/-

(M.NAGAPRASANNA)

JUDGE JS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 230

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top