SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 14540

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
Shivashankar Amarannavar, J
RAVIKUMAR M D – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
CRIMINAL PETITION No. 768 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Ashwin Radhakrishnan
For the Respondents: M R Patil

Anticipatory bail may be granted when a criminal complaint arises from a dispute that is primarily civil in nature, especially if parallel proceedings under the Negotiable Instruments Act are pending and the accused has no criminal antecedents.

Headnote:The petitioners sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) in relation to Crime No. 466/2025, involving offences under Sections 316(1), 318, 351(1), 351(2), 351(3), and 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023. The case originated from an MOU dated 20.08.2020 regarding an investment of Rs.1 Crore, where the complainant alleged non-repayment and cheating, having already initiated proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found that the dispute is primarily of a civil nature. The central issue was whether the petitioners were entitled to anticipatory bail despite allegations of cheating. The court reasoned that since the matter is essentially a financial dispute already subject to litigation under the Negotiable Instruments Act, and given that the petitioners have no criminal antecedents and the alleged offences are not punishable by death or life imprisonment, custodial interrogation is not necessary. The petition is allowed.

Table of Content
1. procedural filing of a petition for anticipatory bail under bnss. (Para 1 , 2)
2. contention regarding the civil nature of a financial dispute versus allegations of cheating. (Para 3 , 4)
3. court's determination that a dispute involving a cheque dishonour and mou is primarily civil. (Para 5 , 6)
4. grant of anticipatory bail based on lack of criminal antecedents and the nature of the offence. (Para 7)

THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 438 Cr.P.C (FILED UNDER SECTION 482 BNSS) PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON ANTICIPATORY BAIL UNDER SECTION 482 OF THE BNS 2023 IN THE EVENT OF THEIR ARREST IN FIR IN CRIME No.466/2025 FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 316(1),318,351(3),351(1),351(2),318(4) OF BNS 2023 REGISTERED BY THE BAGALAGUNTE POLICE STATION.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR

ORAL ORDER

1. This petition is filed by accused Nos.1 and 2 under Section 482 of BNSS praying to grant anticipatory bail in Crime No.466/2025 of Bagalagunte Police Station, registered for offences under Sections 316(1), 318, 351(3), 351(1), 351(2) and 318(4) of BNS, 2023.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned HCGP for respondent/State.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would contend that there was MOU between petitioners and the complainant dated 20.08.2020 under which the complainant has invested Rs.1 Crore in the company of the petitioners. It is alleged that the said amount is not paid and cheque has been issued. The said cheque has been dishonoured and case under Section 138 of the N.I.Act has been filed against the petitioners and it is pending consideration. After lapse of 2 years of dishonour of cheque, the petitioners with similar allegations has filed PCR No.14131/2024. The amount paid by the complainant to the petitioners is subjudice in the cheque dishonour case. The petitioners are ready to co-operate with the IO in the investigation and abide by any terms and conditions to be imposed by this Court. The offences alleged against the petitioners are not punishable either with death or imprisonment for life. There are no criminal antecedents of the petitioners. With this he prayed to allow the petition.

4. Per contra, learned HCGP would contend that under MOU the petitioners have received Rs.1 Crore from the complainant agreeing to repay the same. The petitioners have issued a cheque for repaying the said amount and the said cheque came to be dishonored. The petitioners have cheated the complainant. The petitioners are required for custodial interrogation. With this, he prayed to reject the petition.

5. Having heard the learned counsels, the Court has perused the complaint and other materials placed on record.

6. The complainant has filed a PCR No.14131/2024 against the petitioners. The said complaint came to be referred to police for investigation. The police registered Crime No.466/2025 based on the said private complaint in Bagalgunte Police Station for the aforesaid offences. The averments of the said complaint indicate that the complainant has invested Rs.1 Crore in the company of the petitioners under MOU dated 02.08.2020. It is alleged that the petitioners have not repaid the said amount and cheated the complainant. The complainant had already filed proceedings for offence under Section 138 of the N.I.Act, as the cheque issued by the petitioners has been dishonoured and it is stated to be pending at final stage. Considering the averments of the present complaint, at this stage, it can be said that the dispute between petitioners and the complainant is of civil nature. The petitioners have undertaken to co-operate with the police in the investigation and abide by any conditions to be imposed by this Court. There are no criminal antecedents of the petitioners. The offences alleged against the petitioners are not punishable either with death or imprisonmen

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top